On TechRepublic: Linux desktops have tanked: Get over it
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 1 of 12:
Next »
XP is Faster!
So in all cases except one, Windows
XP with 256 MB of RAM and a much
slower processor was actually faster.
Wow! I want to know what the numbers
would have looked like with the quad
core machine running XP.
Posted by: Stoutner   Posted on: 03/11/08 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

XP is Faster!  Stoutner | 03/11/08
They don't look much different . . .  CobraA1 | 03/11/08
I have to agree, it makes little difference  CobraA1 | 03/11/08
RE: SunSpider JavaScript Benchmark - XP SP2 vs. Vista SP1  richvball44 | 03/12/08
RE: SunSpider JavaScript Benchmark - XP SP2 vs. Vista SP1  alxnsc@... | 03/12/08
What about IE6?  plino | 03/12/08
Re: What about IE6?  Isocrates | 03/12/08
RE: SunSpider JavaScript Benchmark - XP SP2 vs. Vista SP1  spiyda | 03/12/08
IE 6 is more than a bit old and it is not  hkommedal | 03/12/08
Still IE6 is the most used...  plino | 03/13/08
not any more, or for long.  rtk | 03/13/08
Let us hope then that ESRI get their finger out,  hkommedal | 03/13/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Meet Doc