On mySimon: The Biggest Box Sets
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 1 of 50:
Next »
File copy and read times read
These are the improvements that I think most people will welcome.

Improves performance over Windows Vista?s current performance across the following scenarios:

o 25% faster when copying files locally on the same disk on the same machine
o 45% faster when copying files from a remote non-Windows Vista system to a SP1 system
o 50% faster when copying files from a remote SP1 system to a local SP1 system

Improves the time to read large images by approximately 50%.
Posted by: Michael Kelly   Posted on: 02/05/08 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

File copy and read times read  Michael Kelly | 02/05/08
No kidding  croberts | 02/05/08
so...it's almost as good as XP then 6 years later?  Smarty_Pantz | 02/06/08
Kernel  theoxygenthief | 02/05/08
Because there is no brand spanking new kernel.  PB_z | 02/05/08
Have I lost my memory?  kiazersoze | 02/05/08
4 gig is the max addressable under 32 bit  croberts | 02/06/08
4gb limit is per process (?)  pointzerotwo@... | 02/06/08
32-bit = 4 GB RAM address = 3 GB RAM accessible  SteveMak | 02/06/08
"640K will be enough"...  Narg | 02/07/08
Don't get carried away  croberts | 02/07/08
A little knowledge is a dangerous thing  SteveMak | 02/13/08
32 bits vs 64 bits  {DvT}Hex | 02/06/08
HastaLaVista baby  theo_durcan | 02/05/08
Not more RAM  brad77 | 02/06/08
well as for the kiddies...  baalpeteor | 02/06/08
Helpdesk  Kazabet | 02/06/08
RDC  Stuka | 02/06/08
Sticking with XP  scoobyJ | 02/06/08
Re: Sticking with XP  mhunsake | 02/06/08
Not believable  blu_vg@... | 02/06/08
I have to agree  dave@... | 02/07/08
Take a serious look...  PcJunkie | 02/06/08
Vista BSOD ????  Surflover | 02/06/08
Sounds like something is wrong.  notsofast | 02/06/08
Vista Reboot  Keywalker4God | 02/07/08
Sounds like a hibernate/sleep mode issue  blu_vg@... | 02/07/08
BSODs probably due to bad drivers...  {DvT}Hex | 02/06/08
Vista very stable for me  ARiggz | 02/06/08
Vista + nVidia = bad!  Narg | 02/07/08
RE: Vista SP1 highlights in 60 seconds - The reasons why I'll be applying t  adr5@... | 02/06/08
yeah, right, the same as Server reduced reboots  royalef | 02/07/08
RE: Vista SP1 highlights in 60 seconds - The reasons why I'll be applying t  Timpraetor | 02/06/08
Just to the average Joe  morrig | 02/06/08
I'll use it, but hope for more  tBuggR | 02/06/08
RE: Vista SP1 highlights in 60 seconds - The reasons why I'll be applying t  WindowWasher | 02/06/08
As long as I continue to not know about them...  MWPollard | 02/06/08
RE: Vista SP1 highlights in 60 seconds - The reasons why I'll be applying the service pack  bill@... | 02/06/08
RE: Vista SP1 highlights in 60 seconds - The reasons why I'll be applying the service pack  bill@... | 02/06/08
RE: Vista SP1 highlights in 60 seconds - The reasons why I'll be applying t  andy101 | 02/06/08
And the Flash Memory card compatibility?  gilrbranco@... | 02/06/08
RE: Vista SP1 highlights in 60 seconds - The reasons why I'll be applying the service pack  robinsteam@... | 02/06/08
RE: Vista SP1 highlights in 60 seconds - The reasons why I'll be applying the service pack  paul@... | 02/06/08
Funny man  hasta la Vista, bah-bie | 02/08/08
I don't think so  Crossfire | 02/06/08
RE: Vista SP1 highlights in 60 seconds - The reasons why I'll be applying t  pauldoyle98@... | 02/06/08
RE: Vista SP1 highlights in 60 seconds - The reasons why I'll be applying the service pack  scott@... | 02/06/08
I hate binary patching  daengbo | 02/06/08
RE: Vista SP1 highlights in 60 seconds - The reasons why I'll be applying the service pack  v6charlie@... | 02/07/08
RE: Vista SP1 highlights in 60 seconds - The reasons why I'll be applying the service pack  mwagner@... | 02/07/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

Meet Doc