On CBS MoneyWatch: Report: Tiger to Pay Wife $60 Million
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 1 of 172:
Next »
"Infringes our intellectual property"
does it have anything to do with FAT or NTFS? in that case, i'll be very happy to recompile my kernel without the bloat...
Posted by: galileon   Posted on: 11/17/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

"Infringes our intellectual property"  galileon | 11/17/06
Same as SCO  BobF_z | 11/17/06
FUD.  p_msac@... | 11/17/06
property  dwest_z | 11/17/06
So we pay Novell $348 million...  Still Lynn | 11/17/06
What is the reason you haven't  xuniL_z | 11/20/06
What property?  Stuka | 11/17/06
What IP?  Hi_C | 11/17/06
Read the FSF report  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/17/06
To be fair..  NetArch. | 11/17/06
Well duh! What else could they say?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/17/06
Just who paid for this study in the first place?  Laff | 11/17/06
$50, Don  Yagotta B. Kidding | 11/17/06
Wrong, even the poster above knows it.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/17/06
I notice you couldn't point it out  Yagotta B. Kidding | 11/17/06
Hey fool, see my post below.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/17/06
It was OSRM that commissioned the study  NetArch. | 11/17/06
Sorry, the FSF PAID for the study.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/17/06
Not what I found  NetArch. | 11/17/06
Next time, do some research...  Scrat | 11/17/06
Bad link  Scrat | 11/17/06
Now show us where the FSF  Yagotta B. Kidding | 11/17/06
The FSF *PAID* for the study.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/17/06
Proof by Repeated Assertion  Yagotta B. Kidding | 11/17/06
Send the $50 to the American Red Cross  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/17/06
Post the link, Don  Yagotta B. Kidding | 11/17/06
Here's the website of Don's source  j.m.galvin | 11/17/06
Oh, you mean the one...  Physco Dude | 11/17/06
Sorry you are wrong...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/17/06
Changing your tune now?!  Linux User 147560 | 11/17/06
It's time for Don to take a rest  NetArch. | 11/17/06
Only matters to children and fools.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/17/06
That's what SCO thought...  jasonp@... | 11/17/06
You sound like Bill Clingon  Ole Man | 11/20/06
Finally  tombalablomba | 11/17/06
The EU is not the USA  Linux User 1 | 11/17/06
moon beams...  galileon | 11/17/06
The question is  craftycorner@... | 11/18/06
No need to sue, the threat is enough.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/17/06
Maybe  tombalablomba | 11/17/06
No ne will do that.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/17/06
Just a matter of principle  tombalablomba | 11/17/06
Buwahahahaha, no, not when it comes to money.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/17/06
So what is your point  tombalablomba | 11/17/06
Shareholders demand ROI  Linux User 1 | 11/17/06
Knowing the US Patent office  BobF_z | 11/17/06
That's for him to know.  Anton Philidor | 11/17/06
Excellent insights ...  George Mitchell | 11/17/06
What an insult BULLmer is  BeGoneFool | 11/17/06
Yes Balmer, keep putting foot in MS mouth  scole3@... | 11/17/06
Gee, they have more new partners  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/17/06
MS sharpens knife for partners  scole3@... | 11/17/06
SO, "some" fail.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/17/06
hidden agenda = hidden agenda  scole3@... | 11/17/06
Personally  Yagotta B. Kidding | 11/17/06
Patent follies  Anton Philidor | 11/17/06
Thanks...  Cardinal_Bill | 11/17/06
Won't hold water...  Linux User 147560 | 11/17/06
What? Steve spreading FUD? Tell me it aint's so...  Physco Dude | 11/17/06
Alternative possibilities.  Anton Philidor | 11/17/06
anti alternative possibilities  stemcellphone | 11/18/06
Wow  WebThingy | 11/17/06
What the FSF review found  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/17/06
What the OSRM (not FSF) review found  NetArch. | 11/17/06
Doesn't matter, you are avoiding the facts.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/17/06
Oh, just give it up, shill  NetArch. | 11/17/06
So you finally agree, there is PATENTED IP in it.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/17/06
283 Couldn't all be wrong could they?  Rokstar83 | 11/17/06
Once more for the slow ones, IBM does NOT care.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/17/06
Once more for those who make Ad Hominem attacks  Rokstar83 | 11/17/06
Once more if I may (or even if I may NOT)  stemcellphone | 11/18/06
How many IP violations did SCO claim?  jasonp@... | 11/17/06
Stop misrepresenting the study  Letophoro | 11/17/06
You better read it again.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/17/06
This si what ghe author of the "283 patents" claim said:  B.O.F.H. | 11/17/06
Read it, re-read it. I'm still right, and you're still wrong.  Letophoro | 11/17/06
You should have read what the author of the study said!  B.O.F.H. | 11/17/06
Let a Court decide  Linux User 1 | 11/17/06
The study No_Ax refers to is from 2004.  B.O.F.H. | 11/17/06
Ground Zero  Yagotta B. Kidding | 11/17/06
You were right, you are no lawyer, or even close.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/17/06
Seemed well reasoned to me  NetArch. | 11/17/06
Of course it did, just like your claim that  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/17/06
Don, why do you lie in public?  NetArch. | 11/17/06
Lie? No, not a bit.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/17/06
The silence is deafening...  NetArch. | 11/17/06
Silence? Maybe in your little world.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/17/06
Guess I spoke too soon!  NetArch. | 11/17/06
Make the lambs stop screaming...  cdbaric | 11/17/06
it's his depends..  Monkey_MCSE | 11/17/06
However  Michael Kelly | 11/17/06
27 is the number  NetArch. | 11/17/06
And can Red Flat go to court  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/17/06
Very true  Linux User 1 | 11/17/06
Of course they wouldn't go to court  Michael Kelly | 11/17/06
Mandatory claims  Yagotta B. Kidding | 11/17/06
One down  Yagotta B. Kidding | 11/17/06
Forgot about that  NetArch. | 11/17/06
you should have read the review a little better.  B.O.F.H. | 11/19/06
Ballmer should put his money where is mouth is  John L. Ries | 11/17/06
PTO == Patenting The Obvious  Knorthern Knight | 11/17/06
HUH Adrian?  Tim Patterson | 11/17/06
Huh?  Adrian Kingsley-Hughes ZDNet Moderator | 11/17/06
OK  Tim Patterson | 11/17/06
IBM is a ruthless giant also.  osreinstall | 11/17/06
Yes, they are ruthless  Linux User 1 | 11/17/06
Interesting link  Linux User 1 | 11/17/06
IBM is interesting indeed  Linux User 1 | 11/17/06
I heard you.  osreinstall | 11/17/06
Which essentially is no different than any  Linux User 147560 | 11/17/06
That is correct  Linux User 1 | 11/17/06
American corporations???  osreinstall | 11/17/06
Yes, I am sure the Euro corps are just as bad...  Linux User 147560 | 11/17/06
Your anti-Americanism is noted.  osreinstall | 11/17/06
How in hades did you get that idea?  Linux User 147560 | 11/17/06
Your posts.  osreinstall | 11/17/06
Once more for those who make Ad Hominem attacks  Rokstar83 | 11/17/06
Microsoft losses in IP court  cdbaric | 11/17/06
Here's one:  NetArch. | 11/17/06
Non-sense  Linux User 1 | 11/17/06
Classic Ballmer ...  George Mitchell | 11/17/06
But the point is that MS doesn't need to actually sue  Michael Kelly | 11/17/06
I just have to say it  Shelendrea | 11/17/06
Briefly, no.  Anton Philidor | 11/17/06
Bingo!  Linux User 147560 | 11/17/06
But you didn't fill in even the center square?!  Anton Philidor | 11/17/06
Sorry ol' chap  Linux User 147560 | 11/17/06
Here are some more successes....  Linux User 147560 | 11/17/06
That is a great success.  Anton Philidor | 11/17/06
RE: You've won . . .  jlhenry62 | 11/18/06
Hey Linux user and Anton...  Jim Blaine - Bellingham WA. | 11/18/06
Reassurance  Anton Philidor | 11/19/06
Coercion ... hmmm  phburks | 11/20/06
More likely  Michael Kelly | 11/17/06
The Death of Code  Harry Bardal | 11/17/06
Well put.  enduser_z | 11/17/06
Scare off Linux? Help remain on Windoze? Nah to both....  techboy_z | 11/17/06
M$ sues, loses, Companies no longer scared of linux  e_blind81@... | 11/17/06
Not in my lab.  zbeast | 11/17/06
EU  WayOnael | 11/17/06
They have until Thursday next week.  B.O.F.H. | 11/17/06
Wonder how much MS took from Linux?  ibabadur1 | 11/17/06
How much did M$ take from Linux? Plenty.  Mr. Roboto | 11/17/06
Show me your PROOF.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/19/06
Does Anyone Even Listen To What Ballmer Says Anymore?  itanalyst | 11/17/06
Huh? Did he say something? ? ? (nt)  Plain Logic | 11/17/06
He's nothing more than Gates'  swoopee | 11/17/06
One more,  Jack-Booted EULA | 11/17/06
Linux infringes on Micro$oft's intellectual property... EXCUSE ME?????  Mr. Roboto | 11/17/06
His funding of SCO ($50M) failed, so now the direct attack ???  Plain Logic | 11/17/06
Patents... must... die [nt]  Omch'Ar | 11/17/06
I think Data said it best  kcredden | 11/18/06
Dude, go back to your basement TV.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/19/06
In that case...  Jim Blaine - Bellingham WA. | 11/19/06
Should you not follow suit?  B.O.F.H. | 11/19/06
M$ already waived their right to sue linux et al.  thetruth_z | 11/19/06
As much as I believe this to be true  Jim Blaine - Bellingham WA. | 11/19/06
Proof is no problem.... follow the public admissions..  thetruth_z | 11/19/06
Association logic  osreinstall | 11/19/06
huh?? As usual you're way off base..  thetruth_z | 11/19/06
You are a falsehood  osreinstall | 11/19/06
The GPL patent clause is not based on modification.  thetruth_z | 11/19/06
Oh Really...  osreinstall | 11/19/06
RE: Oh really.. Different clause..  thetruth_z | 11/19/06
Coming from a guy who thinks floating nuke plants are safe.  osreinstall | 11/19/06
osreinstall.. you're one of the dimmer blubs from the lot  thetruth_z | 11/19/06
Go away false_z. You screwed up bad on this one.  osreinstall | 11/19/06
Patents - Code does NOT have to be the same!  markharris | 11/20/06
WOW! every 4th reply is from No_ax!  Reverend MacFellow | 11/20/06
Ballmore has been reading ZDNet  Ole Man | 11/20/06
Any discussion about GUI which was invented at PARC?  rajendhran@... | 11/21/06
A legal nightmare for microsoft if  x10nd | 11/22/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement
  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More