On TV.com: PSYCH Is Canceled ? Sike!
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 6 of 17:
Next »
« Previous
RE: Couldn't be more wrong
I'm with Tony on this, it wasn't bundled on Windows, and I don't think they have plans to bundle it with Java. The size may be an exaggeration, and as I mentioned below, with broadband it may be less of an issue, but it's still a concern. And I HATE the update mechanism.
Posted by: ryanstewart   Posted on: 11/13/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Java went open source and about 8 bloggers cared.  brandonthedeveloper | 11/13/06
RE: Java went open source and about 8 bloggers cared.  ryanstewart | 11/13/06
They need to strip out everything you do NOT need for Java in a browser,  DonnieBoy | 11/13/06
Couldn't be more wrong  BillShepp | 11/13/06
Not on Windows  TonyMcS | 11/13/06
RE: Couldn't be more wrong  ryanstewart | 11/13/06
The size of the run-time is only 15 MB, NOT 50 MB. Yes, still too big, but  DonnieBoy | 11/13/06
Maybe the time has come for Java. Before, the problem was download time and  DonnieBoy | 11/13/06
RE: Maybe the time has come for Java. Before, the problem was download time  ryanstewart | 11/13/06
Being nice to Donnie  TonyMcS | 11/13/06
RE: Being nice to Donnie  ryanstewart | 11/14/06
I think the key is Browser Integration of Java to cache programs locally,  DonnieBoy | 11/13/06
Maybe CoreJava?  joe1972 | 11/13/06
RE: Maybe CoreJava?  ryanstewart | 11/14/06
To sumarize: We need a lightweight JVM, specialized for web applications,  DonnieBoy | 11/13/06
No telling  Suicida| | 11/13/06
RE: To sumarize: We need a lightweight ....  ryanstewart | 11/14/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here