On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 3 of 17:
Next »
« Previous
They need to strip out everything you do NOT need for Java in a browser,
and create a special version. The size of the JVM has been a big problem in adoption and getting people to include it. FireFox does not exactly want to add 15 MB to their download. 2 or 3 MB, maybe.
Posted by: DonnieBoy   Posted on: 11/13/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Java went open source and about 8 bloggers cared.  brandonthedeveloper | 11/13/06
RE: Java went open source and about 8 bloggers cared.  ryanstewart | 11/13/06
They need to strip out everything you do NOT need for Java in a browser,  DonnieBoy | 11/13/06
Couldn't be more wrong  BillShepp | 11/13/06
Not on Windows  TonyMcS | 11/13/06
RE: Couldn't be more wrong  ryanstewart | 11/13/06
The size of the run-time is only 15 MB, NOT 50 MB. Yes, still too big, but  DonnieBoy | 11/13/06
Maybe the time has come for Java. Before, the problem was download time and  DonnieBoy | 11/13/06
RE: Maybe the time has come for Java. Before, the problem was download time  ryanstewart | 11/13/06
Being nice to Donnie  TonyMcS | 11/13/06
RE: Being nice to Donnie  ryanstewart | 11/14/06
I think the key is Browser Integration of Java to cache programs locally,  DonnieBoy | 11/13/06
Maybe CoreJava?  joe1972 | 11/13/06
RE: Maybe CoreJava?  ryanstewart | 11/14/06
To sumarize: We need a lightweight JVM, specialized for web applications,  DonnieBoy | 11/13/06
No telling  Suicida| | 11/13/06
RE: To sumarize: We need a lightweight ....  ryanstewart | 11/14/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement