On TechRepublic: Five super-secret features in Windows 7
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 4 of 17:
Next »
« Previous
Couldn't be more wrong
Because the vast majority of people will never need to download the VM - it's bundled on your PC or it's built into your cell phone or TV or automobile. And even for that rare occasion where you might need to download the VM, is 50MB (which is an exaggeration) once or twice a year that big a deal when you consume twice that every time you watch a YouTube video?
Posted by: BillShepp   Posted on: 11/13/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Java went open source and about 8 bloggers cared.  brandonthedeveloper | 11/13/06
RE: Java went open source and about 8 bloggers cared.  ryanstewart | 11/13/06
They need to strip out everything you do NOT need for Java in a browser,  DonnieBoy | 11/13/06
Couldn't be more wrong  BillShepp | 11/13/06
Not on Windows  TonyMcS | 11/13/06
RE: Couldn't be more wrong  ryanstewart | 11/13/06
The size of the run-time is only 15 MB, NOT 50 MB. Yes, still too big, but  DonnieBoy | 11/13/06
Maybe the time has come for Java. Before, the problem was download time and  DonnieBoy | 11/13/06
RE: Maybe the time has come for Java. Before, the problem was download time  ryanstewart | 11/13/06
Being nice to Donnie  TonyMcS | 11/13/06
RE: Being nice to Donnie  ryanstewart | 11/14/06
I think the key is Browser Integration of Java to cache programs locally,  DonnieBoy | 11/13/06
Maybe CoreJava?  joe1972 | 11/13/06
RE: Maybe CoreJava?  ryanstewart | 11/14/06
To sumarize: We need a lightweight JVM, specialized for web applications,  DonnieBoy | 11/13/06
No telling  Suicida| | 11/13/06
RE: To sumarize: We need a lightweight ....  ryanstewart | 11/14/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Meet Doc