On BNET: Is the Mac finally ready for the office?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 1 of 27:
Next »
Did not many people say
including the creator of wikipedia (?) that much of the material and sublect matter retained within wikipedia is not to be regarded as 100 percent factual?
Posted by: GuidingLight   Posted on: 07/13/09 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Did not many people say  GuidingLight | 07/13/09
Perfect example...  Loverock Davidson | 07/13/09
neither is any encyclopedia.  lostarchitect | 07/13/09
Wikipedia is more accurate than encyclopedias  Caggles | 07/13/09
RE: While I'm away...  condelirios | 07/13/09
RE: While I'm away...  Xanthus179 | 07/13/09
And MS doesn't? Bing = MS nt  T1Oracle | 07/13/09
MS...  condelirios | 07/13/09
Google  Ceridan | 07/13/09
Well i guess they will have to figure out what is fact then.  Been_Done_Before | 07/13/09
Microsoft Looses Interest Again  Harry Palmer | 07/13/09
The Web isnt perfect  jdbukis@... | 07/13/09
Personally, I'll be buying an Encyclopedia set  el1jones | 07/13/09
But the trees, think about the trees  ijrosenberg@... | 07/13/09
Waste of money  Caggles | 07/13/09
Validated sources  MoralOrder | 07/13/09
You can't use Wikipedia as a source for a research paper  urbandk | 07/13/09
Encarta was never an acceptable source  Caggles | 07/13/09
RE: While I'm away...  sfriedrich | 07/13/09
The Internet isn't the answer...  sfriedrich | 07/13/09
Missing the point...  joepranay | 07/13/09
brutally powerful advertising sources  bernalillo | 07/13/09
RE: While I'm away...  wilwon32@... | 07/13/09
RE: While I'm away...  frankahilario | 07/13/09
Well... maybe, just maybe...  zkiwi | 07/13/09
Wikipedia was mentioned  seanferd | 07/14/09
You have all seem to have forgotten...  Citizen Gkar | 07/16/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads