On MovieTome: The 10 worst movies of 2009 so far!
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 14 of 84:
Next »
« Previous
I don't agree with that either
I don't see anything wrong with a competitor making factual statements about their products. Now if they were to make non-factual statements or were to draw non-factual conclusions based off misleading benchmarks then that would be a different story. But that would also be liable and/or slander, and you don't need a EULA for protection against that.
Posted by: Michael Kelly   Posted on: 12/31/08 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Benchmarks would be pretty silly at this point.  TripleII | 12/29/08
Come on ...  MisterMiester | 12/30/08
Benchmarks show  daengbo | 12/31/08
You ar right, but can't draw final conclusions.  TripleII | 12/31/08
Why? I really wonder...  Linux User 147560 | 12/29/08
Standard stuff  Ed Bott ZDNet Moderator | 12/29/08
Benchmark Kiddies  honeymonster | 12/29/08
*sigh*  3vi1 | 12/31/08
condescending jerk  thissitesux | 12/31/08
I disagree...  914four | 01/04/09
No surprise you would find something common odd.  ye | 12/29/08
I can't imagine that clause would hold up in court  Michael Kelly | 12/30/08
Aimed at competitors  Ed Bott ZDNet Moderator | 12/30/08
I don't agree with that either  Michael Kelly | 12/31/08
Commercial speech  Ed Bott ZDNet Moderator | 12/31/08
lawyer fulltime employment act  _JimB_ | 12/31/08
How can having it in the EULA make it clear cut  Michael Kelly | 12/31/08
Factual but misleading is the issue.  GuidingLight | 12/31/08
A beta is not an actual product  Michael Kelly | 12/31/08
Yes, Beta is not an actual product.  GuidingLight | 12/31/08
Non factual information ... like "Get The Facts"?  Amelioration | 12/31/08
The #1 paid program  rtk | 12/31/08
Apple fanboy  mjolnar@... | 01/01/09
seems that what an Eula is.  sjbinaz | 12/31/08
The key word there being "sign"  Michael Kelly | 01/02/09
Being told who, what, which, where, why and when is odd.  Amelioration | 12/31/08
It is quite obvious as to why any company requests that  GuidingLight | 12/31/08
Good gracious.  Amelioration | 12/31/08
RE: Surprises in the Windows 7 license agreement  V@... | 12/29/08
These aren't surprises at all  frgough | 12/30/08
Most expensive yet?  Ed Bott ZDNet Moderator | 12/30/08
That you even ask  frgough | 12/30/08
Most expensive?  notsofast | 12/30/08
5 dollars  ggossett001 | 12/31/08
BS  Ed Bott ZDNet Moderator | 12/31/08
Do we know that?  mdsock@... | 12/31/08
Admitted?  Ed Bott ZDNet Moderator | 12/31/08
Again, you're wrong  Ed Bott ZDNet Moderator | 12/30/08
DEFLATION is the key here.  Amelioration | 12/31/08
Many Vistas - and completely pointless  Kaiwai | 12/31/08
MS a technology company?  dabble53 | 12/31/08
I agree, but...  akaltman@... | 12/31/08
Agree 2 versions - But go back to the idea of a "Plus" pack  TG2 | 12/31/08
Amen to That as well!  XweAponX | 12/31/08
Amen to THAT  XweAponX | 12/31/08
"...cut down on revenue losses due to piracy..."  Alan(UK) | 12/31/08
Microsoft creates it's own piracy problems  XweAponX | 12/31/08
Did They Include The "Pay Per Use" Clause In The EULA?  itanalyst2@... | 12/30/08
No, but the final version of Se7en ...  MisterMiester | 12/30/08
License agreement is fine literature...  Mike Cox | 12/30/08
Mike, move on.  nizuse | 12/30/08
I highly doubt...  ShadowGIATL | 12/30/08
Can't handle the jandle?  Kaiwai | 12/30/08
Another one  nizuse | 01/01/09
Proof Read Your Work...  Kromaethius | 12/30/08
If you ever see"virus scan this site"  BALTHOR | 12/30/08
No Benchmarks?  Kaiwai | 12/30/08
EULA  magallanes | 12/31/08
EULA validation  _JimB_ | 12/31/08
But is that legal?  mdsock@... | 12/31/08
If one has enough money.........  Ole Man | 01/11/09
haha I used to go into the Code and change the dates  lynne1462@... | 12/31/08
Give it a whirl....  Crestview | 12/31/08
EULA Lets Get Real  ggossett001 | 12/31/08
You do realize...  Spiritusindomit@... | 12/31/08
Do you realize...?  mdsock@... | 12/31/08
Why bother reading it?  Baer | 12/31/08
You can always send it back for a refund.  V@... | 12/31/08
Time for something new  Theo49 | 12/31/08
Activation and validation are alive and well  Ole Man | 12/31/08
RE: Surprises in the Windows 7 license agreement  ramnet@... | 12/31/08
EULAs are baloney  kimvette | 12/31/08
64-bit only, please - and better multi-core performance?  Spats30 | 12/31/08
Maybe they should make the that the second version.  T1Oracle | 12/31/08
Legacy support...  Raymond Danner | 12/31/08
Legacy lock-in, I think you mean.  Amelioration | 12/31/08
How about a choice?  Crestview | 12/31/08
Put A Stop to "Time-Sensitive Software"  TheVinesKid | 12/31/08
RE: Surprises in the Windows 7 license agreement  Ohioblue8514@... | 12/31/08
I don't plan to use Windows 7...  guygo | 12/31/08
RE: Surprises in the Windows 7 license agreement  phutmacher | 12/31/08
Nope  Ed Bott ZDNet Moderator | 01/01/09
Only Surprise you will get is that its Vista 2.0  PCWizKid | 01/02/09
Everything is in the Cloud as far as applications; or LIVE.  rtirman37@... | 01/03/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here