Exactly, it was a poor comparison...
el1jones | 12/20/07
|

There is nothing meaningful that can be drawn from these comparisons.
ye | 12/20/07
|
 
agree + 1 NT
tombalablomba | 12/20/07
|
 
But it is very useful anyway
shis-ka-bob | 12/21/07
|
 
agree +2 NT
TechExec2 | 12/21/07
|
That "warning" is talking about the comparison of Advisories, not CVEs
georgeou | 12/20/07
|

Inveigle
Win3.1 | 12/20/07
|

GeorgeOu you are no Ryan Naraine.
Non_Zealot | 12/20/07
|
 
agree +1 NT
tombalablomba | 12/20/07
|
 
agree +2 NT
TechExec2 | 12/21/07
|

And yet, George,
msalzberg | 12/20/07
|
 
Message has been deleted.
ego.sum.stig@... | 12/23/07
|

And yet you can't even accurately compare CVE's
Letophoro | 12/21/07
|
Hastily thrown together???
dsw0@... | 12/20/07
|
Of course
Qbt | 12/20/07
|

Bingo! (nt)
ye | 12/20/07
|

but then again
tombalablomba | 12/20/07
|

Translation
frgough | 12/20/07
|

But if at least 25% of the list is wrong..
msalzberg | 12/20/07
|

I totally agree. Nice post.
NonZealot | 12/20/07
|

Coming from a Kool-Aid-drenched MS fanboys
deaf_e_kate | 12/20/07
|
I can't wait
tombalablomba | 12/20/07
|

Not just flame bait
frgough | 12/20/07
|
One of the funniest (maybe saddest) things..
msalzberg | 12/20/07
|

who did? (nt)
doh123 | 12/20/07
|
 
Sorry, I don't understand your question. NT
msalzberg | 12/21/07
|
Defend the Queen at its finest!
Scrat | 12/20/07
|

What evidence?
msalzberg | 12/20/07
|
 
re: What evidence?
M.R. Kennedy | 12/20/07
|
  
Is it?
msalzberg | 12/20/07
|
  
Very shoddy reasoning
MarcB_z | 12/20/07
|

Attack the evidence.... How unfair can you get! - NT
raycote | 12/20/07
|

What is ironic is that Secunia used to be the battle cry for ABMers
NonZealot | 12/21/07
|
 
Secunia is still fine
shis-ka-bob | 12/31/07
|
RE: Mac versus Windows vulnerability stats questioned
Todd Papke | 12/20/07
|
RE: Mac versus Windows vulnerability stats questioned
Harvey Lubin | 12/20/07
|

There are OS X exploits in the wild
NonZealot | 12/20/07
|
 
List them
Martin Pilkington | 12/20/07
|
  
Don't bother
ninhead79 | 12/20/07
|
   
well...
doh123 | 12/20/07
|
  
Ask and ye shall receive: here are the 150
NonZealot | 12/20/07
|
   
Umm, did you read that link?
msalzberg | 12/20/07
|
    
So you deny there are at least 150 exploits in the wild?
NonZealot | 12/20/07
|
     
OuiZealot is right: The user is the ultimate exploit
mdfischer | 12/21/07
|
     
Long answer:
msalzberg | 12/21/07
|
   
My apologies.
msalzberg | 12/20/07
|
    
That's cool, I've been snarky once or twice (or a thousand times)
NonZealot | 12/20/07
|
     
As much as we yell and scream at each other..
msalzberg | 12/20/07
|
     
I totally agree (nt)
NonZealot | 12/21/07
|
   
These are not OS/X vulnerabilities
shis-ka-bob | 01/02/08
|
RE: Mac versus Windows vulnerability stats questioned
smarty_pants | 12/20/07
|
Food for thought
SquishyParts | 12/20/07
|
Sux 2B (Y)Ou
Mike Cox, Sr. | 12/21/07
|

Thank you!!!
ninhead79 | 12/21/07
|

Wow, interesting article!!
NonZealot | 12/21/07
|
 
Message has been deleted.
ego.sum.stig@... | 12/23/07
|
 
No
ego.sum.stig@... | 12/28/07
|
Opinion
loujloujl@... | 12/21/07
|
Opinion
loujloujl@... | 12/21/07
|
ZDnet Cred
SquishyParts | 12/21/07
|
EVEN with corrections
JABBER_WOLF | 12/23/07
|

Try, try, try..
msalzberg | 12/23/07
|
Get over it already
otaddy | 12/29/07
|
does george ou get paid?
Akumal | 01/02/08
|
RE: Mac versus Windows vulnerability stats questioned
lexicon5 | 01/09/08
|