On TechRepublic: 10 dying IT skills
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 1 of 22:
Next »
need for binding elections
If Democracy 2.0 is only about more discussion then nothing is really going to change. We need binding elections on issues, that is, we need national ballot initiatives. In 24 states, we have ballot initiatives. Ballot initiatives permit public policy to catch up with public opinion (as measured by polls) more quickly than in a purely representative system of government. Moreover, ballot initiatives have indirect effects of bringing accountability to representative legislatures, educating citizens about public policy issues, and fostering more creative solutions to the problems we face. The National Initiative for Democracy (http://ni4d.us) is a proposal to add ballot initiatives at the federal level and in all jurisdictions.

NI4D is modeled on direct initiative as practiced in many states, but also introduces three key reforms: (a) NI4D outlaws corporate contributions to campaigns for or against an initiative, reversing the Supreme Court decision in First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti (1978). (b) In existing direct initiative procedures, initiative language is finalized prior to signature collection. There is no informed deliberation, no consensus-building, and no compromise. To address this procedural weakness, NI4D incorporates a public hearing and deliberative committee (a.k.a. citizen jury). The committee has the power to rewrite the initiative, incorporating feedback from all stakeholders. (c) NI4D includes an option to qualify initiative proposals by polling. In large jurisdictions, polling is less expensive and more accurate than signature collection.
Posted by: jpritikin   Posted on: 06/03/09 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

need for binding elections  jpritikin | 06/03/09
Binding citizen participation via Government 2.0  dionhinchcliffe ZDNet Moderator | 06/04/09
online vs offline  jpritikin | 06/04/09
The National Initiative  MichaelGrant | 06/03/09
RE: Building a vision for Government 2.0  CulturalEngineer | 06/04/09
Technology becoming essential to govern  dionhinchcliffe ZDNet Moderator | 06/04/09
The Political MicroTransaction as Catalyst!  CulturalEngineer | 06/04/09
RE: Building a vision for Government 2.0  kferaday | 06/04/09
I'd like to see a national online community for citizens  dionhinchcliffe ZDNet Moderator | 06/04/09
Community building  kferaday | 06/04/09
The Commons-Dedicated Account!  CulturalEngineer | 06/04/09
Designing the Platform as Teacher!  CulturalEngineer | 06/04/09
RE: Building a vision for Government 2.0  Rotkapchen | 06/04/09
It is possible to distinguish between stored information and data though.  dionhinchcliffe ZDNet Moderator | 06/04/09
RE: Building a vision for Government 2.0  adam mertz | 06/04/09
Right, it's not just connecting government with the people...  dionhinchcliffe ZDNet Moderator | 06/04/09
RE: Building a vision for Government 2.0  MedicalQuack | 06/05/09
We need less government, less use of force, not more efficient use of force  albeit | 06/05/09
Governance & Sustainability  CulturalEngineer | 06/07/09
RE: Building a vision for Government 2.0  Virginian | 06/12/09
So You Think You Can Govern?  thall@... | 06/12/09
Governance, Dunbar's Number and Wealth/Status Disparity Implications of ICT  CulturalEngineer | 06/14/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More