On last.fm: Michael Jackson radio - Listen now!
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 3 of 7:
Next »
« Previous
Agreed.
Should he be convicted of a criminal offense?
The laws against exploits might be sufficient.

The case in favor of putting him in jail would be even less ambiguous if his contribution were used to create malware that was spread.

I wonder, too, if the report of his actions in the press has started an investigation. If not, I wonder why not.

A sentence of, say, 20 years would demonstrate an appropriate concern for such actions.
Posted by: Anton Philidor   Posted on: 04/26/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

"Unmitigated Arrogance"?  SecurityGeek_z | 04/26/06
Absolutely - this is not how to solve the problem  morchant | 04/26/06
Agreed.  Anton Philidor | 04/26/06
20 years?  Roger Ramjet | 04/27/06
Absolutely right Roger  morchant | 04/27/06
Screw that  kckn4fun | 04/27/06
Why are you so sure?  morchant | 04/27/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

IT Solutions for 2010

  • Get cost-effective strategies and roadmaps on the most important issues facing IT leaders in 2010! Learn how to easily cut costs and deliver greater efficiency starting with your database, IT compliance management and data center. Visit the IT Leaders Dashboard. Visit the IT Leaders Dashboard.
  • Read about top issues IT decision-makers face every day, plus get cost effective solutions to real life IT problems. Oracle Topline