I think you have it backwards...
No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/02/06
|
 
Yep - that's backwards
pkrdk | 11/07/06
|
|
Have to Disagree Dana
Tim Patterson | 11/02/06
|
|
Yes, Red Hat is the target.
Anton Philidor | 11/02/06
|
|
Nope
Tim Patterson | 11/02/06
|
|
Red Hat IS Linux.
Anton Philidor | 11/03/06
|
Not quite true.
maldain | 11/07/06
|
|
I don't think so.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/02/06
|
|
No so Ax my friend....
Laff | 11/03/06
|
|
Seems people have forgotten that IBM
Linux User 147560 | 11/03/06
|
|
Why would IBM want to get involved.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/03/06
|
|
Same reason every business sue's there is something to
Laff | 11/03/06
|
|
IBM is major part of Mutual Assured Destruction
TripleII | 11/03/06
|
|
Well let's start with
Linux User 147560 | 11/03/06
|
|
Prediction: Microsoft will not sue...
Anton Philidor | 11/03/06
|
|
Timing
Dr. John | 11/07/06
|
|
shocking, cause its MS ..
mad-man | 11/02/06
|
|
re: I don't see RedHat crumble just yet
Arm A. Geddon | 11/02/06
|
|
Lets not get too excited
BobF_z | 11/03/06
|
|
Novell In Break of GPL - And Could Forfeit Right to Distribute Linux
BanjoPaterson | 11/03/06
|
|
Simply not true in this case.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/03/06
|
|
Q: When is a reply not a reply?
BanjoPaterson | 11/03/06
|
|
You are almost right
TripleII | 11/03/06
|
|
That would result in a massive code audit in the kernel.
B.O.F.H. | 11/03/06
|
|
See, that's what I don't understand!?!?
techboy_z | 11/07/06
|
|
Not true....
techboy_z | 11/07/06
|
|
Dana
D. T. Schmitz | 11/03/06
|
|
Then, why does that insane Steve Ballmer,
pberry26@... | 11/08/06
|
|
You do not know what you are talking about.
mobrien_12@... | 11/04/06
|
|
So which patents? And why not...
techboy_z | 11/07/06
|
|
How DARE you, M$!
pberry26@... | 11/08/06
|
Read about top issues IT decision-makers face every day, plus get cost-effective solutions to real-life IT problems.
When you transition from your existing Red Hat environment to SUSE Linux Enterprise from Novell, you can recognize dramatic cost savings, perhaps as much 50%
