On CHOW: Sexy vampire party
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 1 of 42:
Next »
odd
maybe that's how they're making google faster -
just by indexing less?
Posted by: coffeeshark   Posted on: 08/13/09 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

odd  coffeeshark | 08/13/09
Analysis is way too simple  Fred Fredrickson | 08/13/09
Or it could be  GuidingLight | 08/14/09
Too simple indeed  cburkitt2 | 08/14/09
How does the algorithm know its you and not another Fred Fredrickson?  de-void | 08/14/09
Right. Pagerank vs expectations vs quantity  Mikael_z | 08/15/09
RE: The incredible shrinking GOOG! 25% smaller...  Matthew Sommer | 08/13/09
Quite possibly...  Dietrich® | 08/14/09
there seem to be lots of duplicates in most searches  stevey_d | 08/14/09
Duplicates  sirpaul1 | 08/14/09
RE: The incredible shrinking GOOG! 25% smaller...  georgeh36 | 08/14/09
Dreaming...  Metronome49 | 08/14/09
BWHAW HAW HAW HAW HAW... grin  UAC nanny screen | 08/14/09
Not smaller index... more accurate results.  Metronome49 | 08/14/09
Can't get past 552 results...  foremski ZDNet Moderator | 08/14/09
I've noticed the same thing  lehnerus2000 | 08/15/09
RE: The incredible shrinking GOOG! 25% smaller...  ICUR12 | 08/14/09
RE: The incredible shrinking GOOG! 25% smaller...  raul.grp@... | 08/14/09
I have no hidden interests...  foremski ZDNet Moderator | 08/14/09
RE: The incredible shrinking GOOG! 25% smaller...  GeoffDuke | 08/14/09
RE: The incredible shrinking GOOG! 25% smaller...  skellmeyer | 08/14/09
So...references to you fall  The 'G-Man.' | 08/14/09
RE: The incredible shrinking GOOG! 25% smaller...  hiddenharmony@... | 08/14/09
Did it occur to you that...  zkiwi | 08/14/09
I found I was a gay porn star wrong Randall Lind  Randalllind | 08/14/09
That's what you (would) say ...........  goldenpirate@... | 08/14/09
METRICS  CaptOska | 08/14/09
Google Spam  ericesque | 08/14/09
Good question. Important question.  ksheppard@... | 08/14/09
I agree it's an important question  foremski ZDNet Moderator | 08/14/09
smaller is better, no?  gejepe@... | 08/14/09
Author is less longer relevant  dnheller | 08/14/09
Google is deciding what society thinks  TheVoiceOfTruth | 08/14/09
Perhaps exaggeration in the number of result was used as a marketing tool?  adornoe@... | 08/14/09
Poor analysis  Narg | 08/15/09
RE: The incredible shrinking GOOG! 25% smaller...  BaltimoreBarry | 08/15/09
RE: The incredible shrinking GOOG! 25% smaller...  razumney@... | 08/15/09
Good question, I agree  RepliCounts | 08/16/09
WOW ! Its true... Bing gives more search results  phil@... | 08/18/09
RE: The incredible shrinking GOOG! 25% smaller...  pappa_piglet@... | 08/18/09
Google removing many pages for sites  pcfanboy | 08/18/09
The Incredible Shrinking Foremski?  grail@... | 08/20/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement