On GameSpot: Get ready for the Best of 2009 Awards!
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 5 of 9:
Next »
« Previous
They may have a good point
They could easily point to manufacturers who created chips that mimic'ed lexmark ink protection chips on their cartridges so they could sell remanufactured and third party cartridges. Judges ruled against lexmark saying they had unfairly locked their customers into only buying lexmark and therefore had a monopoly.

You could apply that case as existing law, stating that customers who buy apple software are required to buy apple hardware, which then constitutes a monopoly.

You cant argue the same for unix/windows/linux because you can install it on any type of hardware you want.

They may have a case.. just need to find a technologically savvy judge.
Posted by: Been_Done_Before   Posted on: 08/27/08  (Edited: 08/27/2008 @ 10:26) You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Oh this is going to be good  D. T. Schmitz | 08/27/08
Probably something like  frgough | 08/27/08
You cant compare this to firmware.  Been_Done_Before | 08/27/08
Still laughing  frgough | 08/27/08
They may have a good point  Been_Done_Before | 08/27/08
I want Lexmark Ink on my HP Printer  dcmorrow | 08/27/08
Good points...  Been_Done_Before | 08/27/08
Your argument almost sounds reasonable...until...  Cayble | 08/28/08
....  isulzer | 08/28/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

Meet Doc