On MovieTome: Why you didn't see Shatner in TREK
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 2 of 47:
Next »
« Previous
Agreed
And let's not forget that the Exchange connectivity in Entourage is
a long-standing disgrace. I think the only new Exchange-related
feature in Entourage 2008 is the Out of Office Assistant. Their
insistence on using WebDAV and SMTP instead of MAPI is
boneheaded, and causes problems in organizations that lock their
Exchange servers down tight. Outlook 2001 was a great client, I
don't know why they couldn't just recreate an OS X native version.
I long ago gave up on Entourage for Exchange, and just use
Outlook in a Parallels virtual machine.
Posted by: ZDNET_guest666   Posted on: 05/13/08 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Awesome blog!!  NonZealot | 05/13/08
Agreed  ZDNET_guest666 | 05/13/08
Maybe it is because OS X isn't a good OS?  NonZealot | 05/13/08
OSX isn't a good OS?  ceo@... | 05/14/08
Just when i thought there couldn't be a bigger....  xuniL_z | 05/14/08
SORRY DUDE ! but that's yor title .  AdventTech67 | 05/16/08
Ancient history  Juergen Hartl | 02/05/09
Wrong  rparker009 | 02/05/09
Is it purposeful?  MacKeyser | 02/05/09
L2Read  MacKeyser | 02/05/09
Maybe only in...  Qbt | 05/13/08
Tell someone who cares  tonymcs@... | 05/13/08
Yes, why bother with MS Office?  PMDubuc | 05/14/08
ummm....you need to read the talkback rules..  xuniL_z | 05/14/08
I'm not sold on your post either. =P  nix_hed | 05/14/08
No, we chose a Mac to escape the compiled  frgough | 05/14/08
I believe it's called payback?  xuniL_z | 05/14/08
Payback?  MacKeyser | 02/05/09
You MUST be onto something.  TripleII | 05/13/08
Indeed.  Tigertank | 05/14/08
You've grabbed a torch too I see  xuniL_z | 05/14/08
You could shorten your blogs considerbly .....  xuniL_z | 05/14/08
oops. last post should be to blog  xuniL_z | 05/14/08
LOL - exactly - about as much information  socialism=nowhere | 05/14/08
Message has been deleted.  drprod@... | 05/14/08
a bit off topic...  GAXXIS | 02/09/09
No, several hundred, but thanks for the smile.  TripleII | 05/14/08
I stand corrected.  xuniL_z | 05/14/08
And I need to do a better job at not being an ABMer  TripleII | 05/14/08
Well, you are a far cry  xuniL_z | 05/15/08
DIE M$ DIE !!!  AdventTech67 | 05/16/08
Why do you put in the subject and AGAIN in the Body? Are you stupid?  xuniL_z | 05/19/08
Scandal is a strong word  russguill | 05/14/08
News hot off the press!  mark.aggleton@... | 05/14/08
intentional = too much credit  scott1329 | 05/14/08
Never ascribe to conspiracy what can be explained by incompetence  frgough | 05/14/08
Why even use Office for Mac...  bricar2 | 05/14/08
Not always possible  frgough | 05/14/08
I hate to tell you......  xuniL_z | 05/14/08
Or use a pencil  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/17/08
Isn't this about how MS just doesn't have it anymore?  mlindl | 05/14/08
RE: The MS Office 2008 for Mac scandal continues  david.kiwerski@... | 05/14/08
Try this again.....you could shorten your blogs considerably......  xuniL_z | 05/14/08
Message has been deleted.  socialism=nowhere | 05/14/08
Oh please  Vesicant | 05/16/08
You have to consider another  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/17/08
RE: The MS Office 2008 for Mac scandal continues  sdc100 | 02/05/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

Meet Doc