On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 1 of 61:
Next »
Yep
VMwear is starting to look like Windoze - adding unneeded functionality just because it can. Moving VMs around from server to server live - is COOL. But why do you need it? If you are on a consolidation binge and utilization is king, then there will be no "extra" capacity to use for this VM move. Most standard DR scenarios utilize development servers to run production - while prod is down. But dev environments are "lightweight" - lower specs than production, so this DR plan usually doesn't work so well.

VMwear is also replacing *NIX process management. Sun rewrote their entire OS (from BSD-based SunOS to SysV Solaris) JUST to be able to do multi-threading and multi-processor. And that happened more than a decade ago. You would think that Solaris is rock solid now (version 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3 were unusable ...). So why would you trust VMwear to rewrite this same functionality? And are you willing to shoulder the "growing pains" as VMwear gets the kinks out?

Don't get me wrong, I am the proud owner of a VMwear 1.0 license. I supported them when very few people were on their side (and I don't pay for much software). Their workstation solution was superior to SoftWindoze/SoftPC emulators, and it allowed us Linux guys to run Windoze under Linux. It kept Linux "in the game" when there was ALWAYS some critical app that HAD to run in Windoze.
Posted by: Roger Ramjet   Posted on: 11/07/09 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Yep  Roger Ramjet | 11/07/09
Your silly name calling takes away from your  honeymonster | 11/07/09
Yeah  Roger Ramjet | 11/09/09
Right  Richard Flude | 11/07/09
*nix is the way to go with VMware  Use_More_OIL_NOW | 11/07/09
Agreed  murph_z ZDNet Moderator | 11/08/09
Agree  Use_More_OIL_NOW | 11/08/09
Hardware  rijrunner | 11/09/09
Pain and failure  Roger Ramjet | 11/09/09
How is the 20C Richard?  tonymcs@... | 11/08/09
Happy to hear your recommendations  Richard Flude | 11/09/09
Perhaps you could try Ada  tonymcs@... | 11/09/09
Things sure would have been different  Roger Ramjet | 11/09/09
Been there, done that  Richard Flude | 11/10/09
Dinosaur time  tonymcs@... | 11/10/09
Sun Still is Shady.  civikminded | 11/08/09
Actually..you're missing the point(s)  murph_z ZDNet Moderator | 11/08/09
Yes I know  civikminded | 11/08/09
Ok - that makes sense, but let me add  murph_z ZDNet Moderator | 11/09/09
Mainly agree.  nick.holmes | 11/08/09
No  murph_z ZDNet Moderator | 11/08/09
I emailed someone who should know.  nick.holmes | 11/08/09
Remember the legal issues here  murph_z ZDNet Moderator | 11/09/09
Well...  nick.holmes | 11/09/09
NT 4.0  rijrunner | 11/09/09
VMware a personal experience  tonymcs@... | 11/08/09
Poor tony - always dead wrong  murph_z ZDNet Moderator | 11/09/09
Poor Rudy somewhere in the clouds  tonymcs@... | 11/10/09
You forgot to call him "Rudy"... [nt]  Coogol | 11/10/09
Good Point!  tonymcs@... | 11/10/09
I think I know the answer  junknstuff@... | 11/11/09
Why?  Coogol | 11/11/09
RE: The real pros and cons of server virtualization  Ray berry | 11/09/09
HP3000 - MultiProcessingEnvironment  robajoseph15 | 11/09/09
Don't forget the applications  knudson | 11/09/09
Agreed  murph_z ZDNet Moderator | 11/09/09
RE: The real pros and cons of server virtualization  smeeuwsen1@... | 11/09/09
Wee gee..  murph_z ZDNet Moderator | 11/09/09
There are many more advantages to virtualization than you acknowledge  scotth_z | 11/09/09
The benefits you point to  murph_z ZDNet Moderator | 11/09/09
but then you introduce other problems..  scotth_z | 11/09/09
Some answers  murph_z ZDNet Moderator | 11/10/09
even more problems..  scotth_z | 11/11/09
Ok - some more answers  murph_z ZDNet Moderator | 11/11/09
reality check..  scotth_z | 11/13/09
uh uh  murph_z ZDNet Moderator | 11/13/09
Putting money where you mouth is..  JesperFrimann | 11/19/09
RE: The real pros and cons of server virtualization  gmallen@... | 11/10/09
Wanna bet?  murph_z ZDNet Moderator | 11/10/09
cheaper or properly?  scotth_z | 11/14/09
Well ..  JesperFrimann | 11/19/09
OT: squaring your political & technology views...  dedmonst | 11/12/09
This circle not square - (earlier response deleted - this is v.002)  murph_z ZDNet Moderator | 11/12/09
sorry, not convinced...  dedmonst | 11/12/09
No -  murph_z ZDNet Moderator | 11/12/09
Said it before  Roger Ramjet | 11/12/09
yh uh and what's Michigan's unemployment now?  murph_z ZDNet Moderator | 11/13/09
Nice Deflection  civikminded | 11/13/09
That's what you get when you elect  Roger Ramjet | 11/13/09
Who do they vote for... the party that would help them...(not the Repubs).  scotth_z | 11/16/09
Ok - let me see if I can help  murph_z ZDNet Moderator | 11/19/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
Premier Vendor Content Whitepapers, webcasts & resources from our Power Center Sponsors
advertisement

Meet Doc