On CBS MoneyWatch: Report: Tiger to Pay Wife $60 Million
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 1 of 23:
Next »
Rudy de Haas you are an Oxygen theif!
Geez I'm not scared of some stuck in the 70's goggle eyed half-wit! I don't blog to the world about how wrong SCO is or how Groklaw is great but you do blog about all sorts of twaddle. So you should bet your blog on this. I get to decide my spoils should my side win and I mean final victory the very end of this case.

If giving up your blog is too much than you should consider using your real name RUDY DE HAAS! and drop this Paul Murphy nonsense. Although outside of Holland Paul Murphy does not sound as silly and besides you are not doing any favours to the many legitimate Paul Murphy's out there you owe them an apology!

It's nice to dictate the terms of your victory but not the terms of the other sides. Since when does the looser dictate the winners terms??

Why should you not apologise for also being an arrogant bigot twat! No That is too easy. On top of that I can't say I am sorry for making a (any) comment towards you because I am not. I cannot say retrospectively that I did not mean it because I did.

I suggest that if the anti-SCO mob win you have to stop this zdnet blog because you have not the professionalism or competence to justify your existence. Perhaps if the anti-SCO mob loose than we have to vow never to comment on your blog again.
An exile I can somehow manage to manage ;-P

I am not interested in the "appeal court's response" I am interested in final definite victory not any interpretation of where a legal decision at this point in time puts us.

Got the Balls!?
Posted by: junknstuff@...   Posted on: 03/21/09  (Edited: 03/22/2009 @ 02:44) You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Rudy de Haas you are an Oxygen theif!  junknstuff@... | 03/21/09
Rubbish de Hogwash are you a moron!  Coogol | 03/21/09
Ahwww  junknstuff@... | 03/21/09
Sure.  dave.leigh@... | 03/21/09
One step at a time  murph_z ZDNet Moderator | 03/21/09
Being clear  dave.leigh@... | 03/22/09
Crickets are chirping.  dave.leigh@... | 03/23/09
We don't need no stinkin' copyrights  Roger Ramjet | 03/21/09
You (conveniently) overlook a few things.  wolf_z | 03/21/09
Wolf... my man...  dave.leigh@... | 03/22/09
And I'd like  tonymcs@... | 03/22/09
With you on that one...  junknstuff@... | 03/23/09
Don't know a lot about Canadian law, but...  John L. Ries | 03/26/09
Rudy de Haalf Wit rants, world points, laughs, yawns  jdoe2000 | 03/23/09
RE: Once more on SCO  jdoe2000 | 03/23/09
RE: Once more on SCO  Still Lynn | 03/23/09
Somebody forgot to use his meds  wackoae | 03/23/09
RE: Once more on SCO  beaner1111@... | 03/24/09
Time will tell  John L. Ries | 03/26/09
No case, no chance  rkhalloran | 03/27/09
SCOX blustered, then blinked...  rkhalloran | 03/27/09
what the SCO case is really about ..  emacsuser | 03/28/09
Robert X. Cringley wrote...  krsaborio | 04/09/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here