On TechRepublic: Windows 7: Slower to boot than Vista?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 1 of 14:
Next »
Software Engineering
One of the basic tenants of SE is that 90% of the cost of software "projects" (development) is in the maintenance phase. IOW all the work of designing, developing and deploying only amount to 10% of the lifecycle cost. So if you doubled your project dollars, you could have 10 separate (and concurrent) development projects competing to be chosen as the 1 project to be deployed.

This of course gives you 10 times the chances to "get it right" the first time. With the probability that a project will fail being so high, this approach would seem to be "best".

But other costs of having 10 development teams + hardware would make this impractical. BUT would it make sense to add 10% to the cost of a project to have TWO concurrent teams developing? That doubles your chances of success at a pittance of cost.

So what I am trying to say is this: You should always have both a FOSS and a "traditional" development team working on every project. When that last "gate" comes up before you deploy - you can choose which one to go with. I call this the "Put your money where your mouth is" methodology. If Windoze or Noracle fulfills the requirements best - go with that. Pretty simple.
Posted by: Roger Ramjet   Posted on: 03/09/09  (Edited: 03/09/2009 @ 05:38) You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Software Engineering  Roger Ramjet | 03/09/09
Agreed  murph_z ZDNet Moderator | 03/09/09
Only expensive in the short term  Roger Ramjet | 03/09/09
RE: RDBMS license costs and Open Source  pbeach | 03/09/09
Agreed (NT)  murph_z ZDNet Moderator | 03/09/09
Beat the Drums on this one  jcawley | 03/09/09
All week (NT)  murph_z ZDNet Moderator | 03/09/09
And, as we move to cloud computing, cloud vendors are not going to offer  DonnieBoy | 03/09/09
oh the cloud...  Erik Engbrecht | 03/10/09
Perhaps...  dave.leigh@... | 03/10/09
Agreed  murph_z ZDNet Moderator | 03/10/09
I wouldn't, you wouldn't  Ross44 | 03/10/09
RE: RDBMS license costs and Open Source  Kostaghus | 03/09/09
RE: RDBMS license costs and Open Source  JesperFrimann | 03/10/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
Premier Vendor Content Whitepapers, webcasts & resources from our Power Center Sponsors
advertisement
  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More