hmm
alexsp | 10/11/08
|

Huh?
murph_z | 10/11/08
|
Excellent article written by a pro.
NonZealot | 10/11/08
|

Hit the nail right smack on the head
LBiege | 10/11/08
|

Huh?
Erik Engbrecht | 10/11/08
|
 
Thanks Erik
murph_z | 10/11/08
|
I think...
Qbt | 10/11/08
|
RE: Anatomy of an attack: The New York Times on Solaris
reverseswing | 10/11/08
|

Are you serious?
Qbt | 10/11/08
|
 
Perhaps if someone read it to you? very slowly?
murph_z | 10/11/08
|
Sun deserves the attack and much more
progon | 10/11/08
|

whoa there.
isulzer | 10/11/08
|
 
Relax: this guy's comments tend to be "under-informed" (NT)
murph_z | 10/12/08
|

I do hope you're being facetious.
blinddog | 10/12/08
|
 
Chimps are rare
thommym | 10/14/08
|
Well Duhh!
jdubow@... | 10/11/08
|

Why I'm surprised
murph_z | 10/11/08
|

"... politically correct journalistic chops ..."
Anton Philidor | 10/14/08
|
It's mindless people involved in IT...
bjbrock | 10/11/08
|
What else would you expect from the NYT?
riredale | 10/12/08
|

Yeah, but I have question
murph_z | 10/12/08
|
 
Maybe ideology can provide an answer
Mark Miller | 10/13/08
|
ROFL
tonymcs@... | 10/12/08
|

Pot and kettle, together ad infinitum
Scrat | 10/13/08
|
RE: Anatomy of an attack: The New York Times on Solaris
JesperFrimann | 10/13/08
|

Yes and no
murph_z | 10/13/08
|
 
The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly
jcawley | 10/13/08
|
 
If it smells...
JesperFrimann | 10/14/08
|
Isn't the "anti-Sun community" more coterminous...
Anton Philidor | 10/14/08
|
RE: Anatomy of an attack: The New York Times on Solaris
Unix_Magic | 10/14/08
|

Horse can remain dead.
Anton Philidor | 10/14/08
|