On CBS MoneyWatch: Report: Tiger to Pay Wife $60 Million
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 1 of 55:
Next »
re:.
I love how you think of everything in black and white terms... its refreshing. But what if you consider this cognitive dissonance in computing security to be a market itself? Most people don't actually understand very much about the subject due to not their capacity to understand it, but their preconceptions. Consider: SQL injection is actually a very simple concept which involves unescaped strings inside SQL statements. But to many people its equivalent to a kamehameha or [insert some other fantastic reference of choice here]. Since they cannot understand very basic ideas, they then must believe in big names and complex concepts that magically work. This is coupled with their preconception that security must be actively well... active, due to perhaps the idea of a security guard walking the perimeter making sure nothing untoward is occurring. Oddly enough I've found that many people enjoy having this somewhat mystical attitude to various parts of their life. It makes them feel safer, warmer or something. While I can understand, I don't sympathize.

All this boils down to the fact that the management of a company must feel like their security IS actually protecting them. Marketing strategies target this and work well. Consider those annoying microsoft video ads on this very page(very annoying because they occupy all my bandwidth each time I view a single commentary on this page). One of them is a 'robot' that runs around looking cool 'protecting' your computer system. This said, the management hires IT people to perform their jobs(shocking!), but neutralizes them with know-all attitudes and a highly interactive approach to what their security should be. This management attitude(something pretty much inherent to humans), coupled with cognitive dissonance pretty much insures that there will always be a large market for flashy security measures that don't necessarily have to function properly. Which means that your theory that that which works will take over in the long run isn't terribly probably. Especially considering that security issues don't have as great an impact on their bottom line as management and logistic issues do. All this is actually a problem with education. Most business and management degrees cover nothing in the IT security area, so they really cant be expected to have the basic knowledge to make the decisions necessary to protect their operations.

I guess it doesn't help that many IT people are two-bit dumbasses who barely passed high school and managed to get a MS certification or 3. Not to be insulting to said two-bits or anything.

Even you murphy have your share of cognitive dissonance: your belief of the inherent supremacy of Sun system architecture over that of intels. Well yeah, its great to have better IO and ability for CMP, but that is a SMALL(read very damn small) market. That is to say servers make up only a small portion of computers in use. Where applicable, this is a great benefit, if at a cost. Intel Core 2 chips excel in mobile and multimedia products though. Which leads me to suspect that they have been designed for that(No sarcasm or anything). Their Xeon chips do well on workstations and have better memory throughput and so on. Not knowing which architecture would actually be better, Intel's mobile dominance bleeds over into other areas by reputation and familiarity. I would like to note that servers are not used only for number crunching or handling 10,000 http requests per second. There happen to be a few others and each may have a different ideal architecture.
Posted by: isulzer   Posted on: 06/10/08 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

re:.  isulzer | 06/10/08
Agreed  murph_z ZDNet Moderator | 06/10/08
well  isulzer | 06/10/08
Sure  murph_z ZDNet Moderator | 06/10/08
k well.  isulzer | 06/10/08
All models are wrong....  palmwarrior | 06/10/08
Of course  murph_z ZDNet Moderator | 06/10/08
So are you saying you are willing to accept Windows is better?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/10/08
Agreed  murph_z ZDNet Moderator | 06/10/08
If you hold that the winner is persuasive...  Anton Philidor | 06/10/08
Winning is not better  Richard Flude | 06/10/08
If it's an abomination, then nobody should be spending big bucks...  transposeIT | 06/10/08
Learn to read  Richard Flude | 06/11/08
Not getting it.  Anton Philidor | 06/11/08
I think I get it  Richard Flude | 06/11/08
No Facts...  SpikeyMike | 06/10/08
Did you ever consider  Roger Ramjet | 06/10/08
As for the Global Warming stuff ...  Roger Ramjet | 06/10/08
whoa.  isulzer | 06/10/08
Sorry  Roger Ramjet | 06/10/08
re: sorry  isulzer | 06/10/08
Skepticism is good  j.m.galvin | 06/10/08
Thanks! (NT)  murph_z ZDNet Moderator | 06/10/08
Yes, Earth has been cooling for 8-10 years.  Anton Philidor | 06/10/08
Some background on climate change  SpikeyMike | 06/10/08
Global Climate Change  beoz | 06/10/08
What thermometers?  murph_z ZDNet Moderator | 06/10/08
Ample other data  j.m.galvin | 06/10/08
There is more than one way to get temperatures from the past  Hemlock Stones | 06/10/08
Facts and conclusions  carlino | 06/10/08
Politicizing science  Mark Miller | 06/11/08
Sometimes, I don't much care about rational arguement  TheTruthisOutThere@... | 06/10/08
Thank you  Hemlock Stones | 06/10/08
You do realize...  John L. Ries | 06/10/08
Yes - that's kinda the point  murph_z ZDNet Moderator | 06/10/08
Agreed  John L. Ries | 06/10/08
There's a reason why  j.m.galvin | 06/10/08
Liberal eye opener  SpikeyMike | 06/10/08
Academic segregation does pose problems  John L. Ries | 06/10/08
You're getting silly  j.m.galvin | 06/10/08
Maybe  John L. Ries | 06/10/08
Thrown out vs withdrew  j.m.galvin | 06/10/08
RE: Breaking the dialogues of the deaf  isulzer | 06/10/08
Pointless article  GeiselS@... | 06/10/08
Article makes lots of sense...  SpikeyMike | 06/10/08
Missing the point, but wrong anyhow  murph_z ZDNet Moderator | 06/10/08
One way not related to market share ...  Anton Philidor | 06/10/08
Not always, but DATA not baseless opinions helps.  DevGuy_z | 06/10/08
Correction  John L. Ries | 06/10/08
Accurately describes Linux zealots  BFD | 06/10/08
Only Linux zealots?  John L. Ries | 06/10/08
RE: Only Linux zealots?  Windows Defender | 06/10/08
Aren't we taking this seriously  John L. Ries | 06/11/08
RE: Breaking the dialogues of the deaf  X41 | 06/10/08
First you have to understand both OSs  tonymcs@... | 06/10/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

IT Solutions for 2010

  • Get cost-effective strategies and roadmaps on the most important issues facing IT leaders in 2010! Learn how to easily cut costs and deliver greater efficiency starting with your database, IT compliance management and data center. Visit the IT Leaders Dashboard. Visit the IT Leaders Dashboard.
  • Read about top issues IT decision-makers face every day, plus get cost effective solutions to real life IT problems. Oracle Topline