On TechRepublic: Why you aren't landing that job
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 1 of 22:
Next »
Very interesting Murph ...
... but a tad tricky to know if I followed your drift or not.

OOP in my mind is a programmers management tool/way/approach/methodology. I'd find it hard not to write OO now. In the background Erlang is proving an interesting curve, but it's a hobby not a necessity.

Is procedural and message based the future, or OO and message based? And that brings up the whole thing about OOP, it's very nice, but at some point the code has to actually do some work.
Posted by: fr0thy2   Posted on: 06/03/08 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Very interesting Murph ...  fr0thy2 | 06/03/08
I don't really see OOP as always being message based  CobraA1 | 06/03/08
Explanations  s_souche | 06/03/08
Architecture?  CobraA1 | 06/03/08
Yes, boil away the BS and what you've got left is  murph_z ZDNet Moderator | 06/03/08
Your perspective.  isulzer | 06/03/08
re: myself  isulzer | 06/03/08
LISP  murph_z ZDNet Moderator | 06/03/08
ah.  isulzer | 06/03/08
how efficient it would be?  murph_z ZDNet Moderator | 06/03/08
BS!  Erik Engbrecht | 06/05/08
Smalltalk used threads  Mark Miller | 06/03/08
Wish I had gotten in on this sooner  Mark Miller | 06/03/08
"... making the action indistinguishable from the actor ..."  Anton Philidor | 06/03/08
OOP has its limits  Linux Geek | 06/03/08
As a model...  Anton Philidor | 06/03/08
RE: Oddball thinking about OOP  progon | 06/03/08
You know there is medication for  tonymcs@... | 06/03/08
Simple  Richard Flude | 06/03/08
What failure? Don't we all know how to write an OOP program when needed?  DannyO_0x98 | 06/03/08
RE: Oddball thinking about OOP  Paul W. Homer | 06/04/08
OOP not appropriate to all domains  Mark Miller | 06/04/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement
Click Here

Meet Doc