On CBS.com: Watch Exclusive CSI Cross Over Video
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 1 of 26:
Next »
What's fair? PRICE
My former employer had a yearly workstation benchmark process. We would invite the big 4 UNIX workstation vendors (HP,Sun,IBM,SGI), give them the applications and test matrix - and let them tune their boxes to their hearts content. After the benchmark was complete, we looked at price/performance numbers and made an informed decision. Bear in mind that this company purchased about 1000 workstations per year - which is enough to keep the vendors interested and "honest". Even the losers of the benchmark came back with lower quotes to win business (SGI lost one year and we ended up buying O2 workstations for a couple grand - a rock bottom price in those days).

It was relatively simple to benchmark UNIX CAD/CAM workstations - as the user experience is not too hard to measure. We tried looking at this same process for servers, but the costs of running it were high. To stress test a large infrastructure application, you would need server, SAN, Disk arrays, network, power and SOFTWARE LICENSES for things like Oracle, Datastage, Websphere, etc. Not to mention that some apps don't run on some platforms, so you need "equivalents". Then you have to compare things like - does support come with the platform (bundled) or separate (a la carte)? Just looking at a bill of sale for a large server is pretty disheartening (IBM P690: Power cord - $1000, Front rack door - $5000, Rear rack door - $4000, Total rack price (no computer) $40k). Would price/performance be better if we left off the doors? . . .
Posted by: Roger Ramjet   Posted on: 04/16/08 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

What's fair? PRICE  Roger Ramjet | 04/16/08
Yes  murph_z ZDNet Moderator | 04/16/08
Well now...  JesperFrimann | 04/18/08
Once again you state as facts ....  ShadeTree | 04/16/08
To answer one question.  odubtaig | 04/17/08
Agree with ShadeTree: baseless arguments  DevGuy_z | 04/16/08
oh boy - some answers  murph_z ZDNet Moderator | 04/16/08
Technicaly it didn't fall.  odubtaig | 04/17/08
Any exploit that targets a buffer overflow ....  ShadeTree | 04/17/08
Ah  odubtaig | 04/17/08
RE: Ou is not a credible source  klumper | 04/16/08
Real World IT  Erik Engbrecht | 04/16/08
Thanks  murph_z ZDNet Moderator | 04/16/08
Defending assertions  Anton Philidor | 04/16/08
Because "I said so" is not a ....  ShadeTree | 04/17/08
Which is interesting.  odubtaig | 04/17/08
You missed this conversation by a mile.  ShadeTree | 04/17/08
I didn't claim any such thing.  odubtaig | 04/17/08
I didn't gloss over anything!  ShadeTree | 04/17/08
So...  odubtaig | 04/17/08
Are you deliberately attempting ....  ShadeTree | 04/17/08
I'll quote you shall I?  odubtaig | 04/17/08
Do you have a point?  ShadeTree | 04/17/08
You sure about that?  odubtaig | 04/18/08
I have no problem with the hardware specified ....  ShadeTree | 04/18/08
Whatever.  odubtaig | 04/18/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
Premier Vendor Content Whitepapers, webcasts & resources from our Power Center Sponsors
advertisement
  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More