On mySimon: Holiday Gifts For Her
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 1 of 31:
Next »
Oh no, not more IT people who think they know about accountancy
"A big part of the problem here arises because accounting ideas are extremely stable over time while IT ideas are not. Thus our idea of a system wide control is fifty or more years ahead of theirs "

Well the ideas are exactly the same. You have controls in place to detect discrepancies and then find and eliminate the causes of those discrepancies. If there is a discrepancy then it means something has gone wrong, if it is in an automated system then you have a systematic failure (a bug). The only difference IT makes is to make the controls more automated (and ought to make them more reliable, if you have competent IT people who understand finance).

Anyone who thinks IT ideas are moving forward at an incredible rate has been listening to too many Microsoft, IBM and Sun salesmen.

I have had to work on so many systems that have a financial component that have been designed by people who don't even have a clue about the basic principles of bookkeeping that I have long lost tolerance with IT people who seem to have nothing but scorn for accountants.

What would you trust? A system that was designed by a genius of the Italian renaissance (Pacioli the inventor of double entry bookkeeping) and has been working extremely well for the last four hundred years or a C++ programmer with an enormously inflated sense of his own importance (and without a clue about basic business knowledge). In this respect IT never actually catches up with accounting, the idea that IT is fifty years ahead is a complete joke.

The IT ideas that keep changing are hype largely, the important ideas haven't changed much at all.
Posted by: jorwell   Posted on: 08/02/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Oh no, not more IT people who think they know about accountancy  jorwell | 08/02/06
This is why...  John L. Ries | 08/02/06
Very true  jorwell | 08/02/06
Communication is key  Roger Ramjet | 08/02/06
Why Sun are in trouble  jorwell | 08/02/06
Don't let Sun bigots  Roger Ramjet | 08/02/06
Sun "bigots"  jorwell | 08/02/06
Long book  Roger Ramjet | 08/02/06
Just one important point  jorwell | 08/02/06
Funny, I remember the VAX fondly.  jplatt39 | 08/02/06
What I meant was  jorwell | 08/02/06
Connect the dots please  Erik Engbrecht | 08/02/06
Declare victory by throwing in the towel  Roger Ramjet | 08/02/06
Option #3  Richard Flude | 08/02/06
I am unworthy  jorwell | 08/02/06
Do not despair. Despair is a sin against the Holy Spirit...  jplatt39 | 08/02/06
Adequate?  jorwell | 08/03/06
My sense of humor is I have no sense of humor  jplatt39 | 08/03/06
About COBOL  jorwell | 08/06/06
How about Ada?  Roger Ramjet | 08/03/06
Well I am not familiar with Ada  jorwell | 08/03/06
Ada is mostly used today  Roger Ramjet | 08/03/06
To some extent true  jorwell | 08/03/06
Ada and C++ (not C/C++)  Erik Engbrecht | 08/04/06
Let's quarter him  Arnout Groen | 08/02/06
ITIL is a process  Roger Ramjet | 08/02/06
Consistency.  Anton Philidor | 08/02/06
ITIL has overlap  Roger Ramjet | 08/02/06
Forget the arguments - let's try reality  TonyMcS | 08/02/06
Are you feeling okay? You sounded almost coherent  jplatt39 | 08/02/06
Coherent  TonyMcS | 08/03/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here