On TechRepublic: 12 tech terms that make you sound old
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 1 of 29:
Next »
Freescale had their chance
Freescale was around and in-contention when Apple made their (latest) deal with the devil. Why didn't Apple jump on it in the first place? The roots of this decision go back to the begining, when Apple, IBM and Motorolla came together to form the PPC alliance. The idea was share and share alike to promote PPC everywhere. Motorolla was quite happy with this arraingement, but IBM was not. IBM forked the development of the PPC because of their late start into the RISC/UNIX marketplace. So, while IBM was making better and better chips for their workstations/servers - they gave lip-service and SLOOOOW progress in evolving the Mac PPC chips. Motorolla did NOTHING to "up the ante" - NEVER becoming a leader in the PPC development. SO Apple had a partnership with a welcher and a wimp. Now that Motorolla split its PPC unit off into Freescale, can you trust them to deliver BETTER processors (revolutionary vs. evolutionary)? This new PPC from Freescale MIGHT look great, but their history says that loafing and status quo are their company values.

If you want to make deals with small fry, why not MIPS? Make the deal with SillyGraphics that you could NEVER seem to do with Sun. This would boost ALL of the companies - more so than the original PPC alliance. Maybe give MATROX a shot at the graphics . . .
Posted by: Roger Ramjet   Posted on: 02/16/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Freescale had their chance  Roger Ramjet | 02/16/06
Motorola went NT - like HP, and is now hurting  murph_z ZDNet Moderator | 02/16/06
Exactly  tic swayback | 02/16/06
Freescale is not motorola  murph_z ZDNet Moderator | 02/16/06
I'd still be hesitant  tic swayback | 02/16/06
Linux? Where did that come from?  Accidental Angel_z | 02/16/06
Lintel offers for a home for mactel  murph_z ZDNet Moderator | 02/16/06
What do you mean by "a home for Mactel"?  Accidental Angel_z | 02/16/06
hes suggesting  doh123 | 02/16/06
I.e., what Apple should do with existing Intel inventory?  Accidental Angel_z | 02/17/06
Not required  Richard Flude | 02/16/06
Most of Darwin APSL, not GPL  Accidental Angel_z | 02/17/06
Missing a real key  tic swayback | 02/16/06
Daystar G4 upgrade announcement  murph_z ZDNet Moderator | 02/16/06
give me a break...  doh123 | 02/16/06
Yawn.  vdraken | 02/16/06
Was Sun in the Picture  questioner | 02/16/06
Don't think so - and should have been  murph_z ZDNet Moderator | 02/17/06
But ....  fredsmith6 | 02/17/06
NextCom does  questioner | 02/18/06
Can I have a link to the 2.1GHz MPC8641D  thunderdome1 | 02/16/06
Hang on a mo ....  fredsmith6 | 02/16/06
Plab B = Intel (from 2001)  murph_z ZDNet Moderator | 02/17/06
A chip for Microsoft?  Jens T. | 02/17/06
fake benchmarks scores more effectively! sad  isserley | 02/17/06
uhh, matt?  murph_z ZDNet Moderator | 02/17/06
alright then  isserley | 02/17/06
Yes - this is the Altivec effect  murph_z ZDNet Moderator | 02/17/06
XBox and Cell CPU are not comparable to G4/G5  hdevaux | 02/21/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
Premier Vendor Content Whitepapers, webcasts & resources from our Power Center Sponsors
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here