On CBS MoneyWatch: 5 Holiday Shopping Tips
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 1 of 18:
Next »
well..
I think the massive increase in parallelism in the processors would be best utilized if a user/the system would dedicate certain cpus to certain task/process/service/threads. In an unix environment dedicating one processor to run Apache, another to handle mysql, i know it could get messy but wouldn't making the OS distibute the threads/processes to specific cpus be easier?
Posted by: Dolcraith   Posted on: 08/10/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

well..  Dolcraith | 08/10/05
You can now but...  murph_z ZDNet Moderator | 08/10/05
32 concurrent Windows processes...  Erik1234 | 08/10/05
Sounds like you've been doing...  Anton Philidor | 08/10/05
LOL - very funny  murph_z ZDNet Moderator | 08/10/05
Tasks  Roger Ramjet | 08/10/05
Actually, I'm not suggesting an MP compiler  murph_z ZDNet Moderator | 08/10/05
Parallelism in Algorithms  jacarter3 | 08/10/05
Absolutely  murph_z ZDNet Moderator | 08/10/05
Divide and Conquer  Erik1234 | 08/11/05
Use the 32*8 for special tasks  Francisco Reis | 08/10/05
Big "if"  george_ou | 08/10/05
ain't that the brutal truth  murph_z ZDNet Moderator | 08/10/05
heres some brutal truth  zzz1234567890 | 08/10/05
I'm not a "Microsoft" guy  george_ou | 08/10/05
Depends on the Target  Erik1234 | 08/11/05
Rare on server side too  george_ou | 08/11/05
A reference - for those who can read  murph_z ZDNet Moderator | 08/11/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here