On The Insider: Movie Roles the Stars Turned Down
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 1 of 14:
Next »
In Steve's defense
He NEVER SAID that Apple would use an x86 processor - only an InHell one. This leaves SOME wiggle room to backing away from x86, but the timing is critical - as developers are starting to want new Macs to develop on.

Using a "straight" x86 chip solution is DEATH to Apple. Jobs stopped mac clones before, but it would be impossible now. OS/X would become just another (pirated) OpSys that runs a FEW applications on a PC. This makes no sense - except for seppuku!

Using the OLD Apple "ROMs" solution means having custom motherboards (more expensive), and slowing processing down (as programs "hit" the ROMs). As experience has shown in the past (Shapeshifter), ROMs can be emulated in software - and thus OS/X could be pirated.

x86 solutions don't work well for running the old PowerPC software - and Apple has shown its "great" ability to create emulators before (NOT). So to move to a new "cheaper" mac, users will have to BUY more software - thus killing the value proposition.

SPARC is an interesting chip idea for Apple - but its just not fast or cheap enough. Only InHell, AMD, and IBM are capable of producing cheap CPUs - and AMD and InHell are equal in the eyes of Apple (and IBM sux).

Here's my idea - InHell has a chip that they could deliver today that has a "cult" following like the G4/G5 macheads - its called Alpha(AXP?). Making no changes to the Alpha die except to shrink it to 90nm, could/would bring the performance up to G4/G5 levels. InHell could make them cheap enough (no design costs), and macheads could once again have an "exclusive" on CPUs. The Alpha chip has a "downloadable personality" capability, which I believe allows you to download your own byte code - thus you could run those PPC programs with a minimum of emulation (not sure if DEC used this to run Windoze).

Will the Alpha rise again? I believe it would be the salvation of Apple - and a big bonus for InHell.
Posted by: Roger Ramjet   Posted on: 08/02/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

In Steve's defense  Roger Ramjet | 08/02/05
Alpha? Might be a good idea - i don't know  murph_z ZDNet Moderator | 08/02/05
AXP  Roger Ramjet | 08/02/05
Save this column  baggins_z | 08/02/05
Or a good cry  Roger Ramjet | 08/02/05
I don't see the problem  Jkirk3279 | 08/03/05
Yes, and I think people at Apple agree with you  murph_z ZDNet Moderator | 08/03/05
Are you sure about this?  Linux User 147560 | 08/02/05
Yes, I'm sure  murph_z ZDNet Moderator | 08/02/05
RE: Yes, I'm sure  Linux User 147560 | 08/02/05
Jeez...  BitTwiddler | 08/02/05
InHell and NOT Pentium  Roger Ramjet | 08/02/05
LOL, are you going to cry when it comes out using Pentium?  george_ou | 08/03/05
Think Pentium M Powerbooks!  MacGeek2121 | 08/03/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
Click Here
advertisement

Meet Doc

  • Here to help you with your Document Management Needs
  • Doc is an enigma. Born to a Russian ballerina and a German electrical engineer, he grew up in various locations in the United States. He’s seen the insides of more brands, versions, and generations of printer and printer-related hardware than almost anyone.
  • To learn more about this mysterious figure check out his blog on ZDNet. You’ll be glad you did.
  • Produced by
    ZDNet and