On mySimon: Pea Coats Are Another Wardrobe Staple
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 1 of 53:
Next »
So the answer will be change the technology, right??
...I certainly hope not. The person responsible should be fired immediately, if this group is supposed to be so secretive and protective of their data. Putting ANY work-related material on your personal computer is not only a bad idea, it may be against company policy; it may be against the law!
Posted by: mattcang   Posted on: 11/04/09 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

So the answer will be change the technology, right??  mattcang | 11/04/09
It is against the Law  doug.hanchard@... ZDNet Moderator | 11/04/09
Overwork - what else is new  jgwinner | 11/04/09
No excuse is rational  doug.hanchard@... ZDNet Moderator | 11/04/09
Overwork -- my foot!!  brambeus | 11/04/09
No, you refuse job offers that you can't handle.  AzuMao | 11/06/09
And then immediately start looking for other jobs  UsersRevil | 11/08/09
If you can't handle ANY kind of job, then don't live on your own.  AzuMao | 11/09/09
Yep  AzuMao | 11/04/09
Funny you should mention the RIAA  doug.hanchard@... ZDNet Moderator | 11/04/09
Some People Just Don't Get It  MichP | 11/04/09
Yes she took the files home  dgrainge | 11/04/09
Lapse in IT security Policy  maxbitu2@... | 11/05/09
Nah  AzuMao | 11/06/09
RE: U.S. Ethics Committee staffer file-shares sensitive document  george@... | 11/04/09
Ethics and Religion are taboo now  DaveMorris | 11/04/09
In this case, I'd rather the whole world saw it.  Dr_Zinj | 11/04/09
absolutely let it out  Albert G | 11/04/09
Not Quite  RoughWriter | 11/04/09
They should be fired.  Tommy S. | 11/04/09
"file sharing should be banned"??  frylock | 11/04/09
Cannot ban file sharing  kc117mx | 11/04/09
Sure can ban file sharing.  twaynesdomain | 11/04/09
You could use the same logic..  AzuMao | 11/05/09
Don't agree with the drug analogy....  Rezinunts | 11/05/09
They do try..  AzuMao | 11/06/09
RE: U.S. Ethics Committee staffer file-shares sensitive document  frylock | 11/04/09
Investigations should be secret  doug.hanchard@... ZDNet Moderator | 11/04/09
Innocent Until Proven Guilty?  hnoyes | 11/04/09
Leaking also compromises prosecution.  djchandler | 11/04/09
Didn't you read the first two letters of the title!?  AzuMao | 11/05/09
RE: U.S. Ethics Committee staffer file-shares sensitive document  jamander4 | 11/04/09
RE: U.S. Ethics Committee staffer file-shares sensitive document  ha9946 | 11/04/09
Firewalls, mail filters  davidr69 | 11/04/09
Passwords?  jiangsheng | 11/04/09
foxes to guard the foxes  paladin2 | 11/04/09
RE: U.S. Ethics Committee staffer file-shares sensitive document  jbryant@... | 11/04/09
RE: U.S. Ethics Committee staffer file-shares sensitive document  graychong | 11/04/09
RE: U.S. Ethics Committee staffer file-shares sensitive document  mattcang | 11/04/09
RE: U.S. Ethics Committee staffer file-shares sensitive document  graychong | 11/04/09
security settings!  dgrainge | 11/04/09
RE: U.S. Ethics Committee staffer file-shares sensitive document  spencerhaley | 11/04/09
Every screw-up starts with a good idea  gary@... | 11/04/09
Obviously, the technology is not the problem  schmandel@... | 11/05/09
Deliberately leaked?  softwareFlunky | 11/05/09
Why not?  stumitchvt | 11/05/09
Hanlon's razor.  AzuMao | 11/06/09
Maybe  stumitchvt | 11/06/09
Or perhaps they weren't thinking.  AzuMao | 11/06/09
RE: U.S. Ethics Committee staffer file-shares sensitive document  Headspin | 11/05/09
Oh boy... this is great for us! or not.  Tuxu | 11/06/09
Why should this info be secret?  Grtgatz | 11/07/09
Just because.  AzuMao | 11/07/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads