It IS indecent.
feskridge@... | 12/08/08
|

What is Indecent?
jonno14 | 12/08/08
|
 
Shock Rock reborn
Ruttiger_Simpson | 12/08/08
|
  
What are we censoring??
jonno14 | 12/08/08
|

...and so are the exposed faces of women
odejoy | 12/08/08
|
No question: obscene
Zathros | 12/08/08
|

Obscene or bad taste! So what?
pvandck | 12/08/08
|
RE: British ISPs block Wikipedia over album cover
TomasWilliam | 12/08/08
|

The word virgin on the album would suggest the sexual intent.
T1Oracle | 12/08/08
|
 
so when the catholics chants virgin mary
willyu | 12/08/08
|
  
Connotation matters
T1Oracle | 12/13/08
|
 
..so the word "killer" suggests homicidal intent?
AySz88 | 12/08/08
|
  
So then all forms of innuendo are beyond your comprehension? nt
T1Oracle | 12/13/08
|
RE: British ISPs block Wikipedia over album cover
supinesmarmy | 12/08/08
|
What does the US Supreme court have to do with it?
balsover | 12/08/08
|

Everything....
hungryjoe | 12/09/08
|
RE: British ISPs block Wikipedia over album cover
twaynesdomain | 12/08/08
|
Britain should know better
bblackmoor@... | 12/08/08
|
RE: British ISPs block Wikipedia over album cover
FIREDANCERLEAH | 12/08/08
|

call a spade a spade, this is obscene and exploitative
jacec | 12/08/08
|
 
Okay. Just don't look then
le_foot | 12/08/08
|
  
How does not looking protect small children? nt
T1Oracle | 12/13/08
|
Re: Images of children in Art
V@... | 12/08/08
|
RE: British ISPs block Wikipedia over album cover
misha1000 | 12/08/08
|
RE: British ISPs block Wikipedia over album cover
janeyruth | 12/08/08
|
RE: British ISPs block Wikipedia over album cover
MikeSchinkel | 12/09/08
|
RE: British ISPs block Wikipedia over album cover
edwards111 | 12/09/08
|
RE: British ISPs block Wikipedia over album cover
catapa | 12/09/08
|
Less porn than coppertone logo
freedem | 12/09/08
|
Lots of bad decisions all around ...
terry flores | 12/20/08
|

Britain has lost the script...
dlpage@... | 01/02/09
|