Let them pay it in jail time
TheTruthisOutThere@... | 10/08/08
|

Not a realistic solution.
WSHBaker@... | 10/08/08
|
 
We can afford to lock up potheads but not spammers?
bernalillo | 10/09/08
|

Jail is expensive to the taxpayer
Morti | 10/08/08
|
 
Jail less expensive than anarchy
turncoat | 10/08/08
|
  
If jail is too expensive...
Macs4EaseOfUse | 10/08/08
|
   
Basic misunderstanding of the death penalty
josephmartins | 10/08/08
|
    
Where's Dexter when you need him?
dave@... | 10/08/08
|
     
I've always said that
merc2dogs` | 10/08/08
|
     
As with Hound's response...
josephmartins | 10/08/08
|
    
Oh Please
houndgb | 10/08/08
|
     
We're not in disagreement
josephmartins | 10/08/08
|
    
I cant velieve people even use cost as rational for killing or not killing
bernalillo | 10/09/08
|
  
How about
Redcell | 10/08/08
|
  
and the feds could foot the bill
catsend | 10/09/08
|
 
jail
genknorr@... | 10/08/08
|
 
Jail is expensive to the taxpayer
hubcap1 | 10/08/08
|
 
Personally I like the stocks.
bernalillo | 10/09/08
|

Maybe on repeat offenders...
Cayble | 10/08/08
|
 
laws can allow for a range of punishment
bernalillo | 10/13/08
|

Not Possible
GeneBuettner | 10/08/08
|

Jail time is expensive, bullets are cheap ...
Timpraetor | 10/09/08
|
Sadly, it's pointless
Rick_R | 10/08/08
|
RE: $236m judgment against spammer couple
WSHBaker@... | 10/08/08
|

they could become
Redcell | 10/08/08
|
RE: $236m judgment against spammer couple
LMsale123@... | 10/08/08
|

RE: $236 and e-mail
Ohioblue8514@... | 10/08/08
|
RE: $236m judgment against spammer couple
compusolver | 10/08/08
|

what happend to the e-mail amount ips used to put of a account
missplaced | 10/08/08
|
 
That's for OUTBOUND messages
GeneBuettner | 10/08/08
|
  
The Spamm had to be uploaded somewhere
missplaced | 10/08/08
|
 
Bot networks
bernalillo | 10/13/08
|

RE: $236m judgment against spammer couple
houndgb | 10/08/08
|

That's great
rkoman@... | 10/08/08
|
 
thats great !!! ?
missplaced | 10/09/08
|
 
Block port 25
Timpraetor | 10/09/08
|
 
Sadly, not so great.
bernalillo | 10/13/08
|

Penny For Your THoughts?
ewingdweller | 10/08/08
|
Sorry, my error
Roc Riz | 10/08/08
|
RE: $236m judgment against spammer couple
loveofmusic | 10/08/08
|
RE: $236m judgment against spammer couple
clareJ | 10/08/08
|
Unsolicited commercial emails should be legit, illegal ads shoudl be banned
amirams@... | 10/08/08
|

Email Less Intrusive? Say Whut?
turncoat | 10/08/08
|
 
Less Intrusive? No way.
albevier@... | 10/08/08
|
  
TV and radio, even print, are still more intrusive
amirams@... | 10/08/08
|
   
Newspaper ads are an implicit cost
stchrispy | 10/08/08
|
    
Why do you think you have the right to deprive me from receiving ads?
amirams@... | 10/08/08
|
     
Deprivation!!! Oh No!!!
Spudplucker | 10/08/08
|
     
amirams constant search for the bigger, better penis
deusXmchna | 10/09/08
|

6 billion people...
cgarrett | 10/08/08
|
 
is not unsolicited commercial called T V
missplaced | 10/08/08
|
  
Hole Spell!
darnton@... | 10/08/08
|
   
A guess
frabjous | 10/08/08
|

Unsolicited email of any kind is SPAM
DJnRF | 10/08/08
|
 
So you want your friends to verify themselves
rkoman@... | 10/08/08
|
  
So the world is binary to you???
The Smoking Man | 10/08/08
|
  
spammers
WATKINS12@... | 10/08/08
|
  
I would have thought........
DJnRF | 10/08/08
|
   
Bad spam cannot be stopped
amirams@... | 10/08/08
|
    
That's nonsence.
bernalillo | 10/09/08
|
 
email of any kind is SPAM
missplaced | 10/09/08
|

Legitimate?
drobinow | 10/09/08
|
 
legitimate commercial
missplaced | 10/09/08
|
RE: $236m judgment against spammer couple
dingers412@... | 10/08/08
|
RE: $236m judgment against spammer couple
TSGlassey | 10/08/08
|
RE: $236m judgment against spammer couple
croakbi@... | 10/08/08
|

Missing the point
croakbi@... | 10/08/08
|
 
ad=free sam=free
missplaced | 10/08/08
|
 
Very good point
DJnRF | 10/08/08
|

the internet...
Redcell | 10/08/08
|
 
It's commercial now. Live with it.
drobinow | 10/09/08
|
  
"Commecrce" does not mean free from regulation
bernalillo | 10/09/08
|
   
if you do not like a site E-MAIL the IPS
missplaced | 10/09/08
|
RE: $236m judgment against spammer couple
mrwelch98@... | 10/08/08
|
RE: $236m judgment against spammer couple
frj111@... | 10/08/08
|

Judgment
clifflee | 10/08/08
|

the punishment most dastardly
opcom | 10/08/08
|
RE: $236m judgment against spammer couple
kentreybig | 10/08/08
|
RE: $236m judgment against spammer couple
adamaia | 10/08/08
|
RE: $236m judgment against spammer couple
ljessup@... | 10/08/08
|

look for a local IPS that is spam filtering
missplaced | 10/08/08
|
RE: $236m judgment against spammer couple
ois1@... | 10/08/08
|

not prison
missplaced | 10/08/08
|
RE: $236m judgment against spammer couple
john.lellis@... | 10/08/08
|
Absurd laws (and the lack of it)
rhon@... | 10/08/08
|
RE: $236m judgment against spammer couple
timbrady1124@... | 10/08/08
|
RE: $236m judgment against spammer couple
NerdHerd007 | 10/08/08
|
RE: $236m judgment against spammer couple
ceh4702 | 10/08/08
|

Bogus Addresses
cgarrett | 10/08/08
|
RE: $236m judgment against spammer couple
missplaced | 10/08/08
|
RE: $236m judgment against spammer couple
onclejon@... | 10/08/08
|
RE: $236m judgment against spammer couple
Billsey | 10/08/08
|
RE: $236m judgment against spammer couple
Flagg_z | 10/08/08
|
RE: $236m judgment against spammer couple
flyingbuick | 10/08/08
|

a GOOD IPS should take care
missplaced | 10/08/08
|
RE: $236m judgment against spammer couple
XLINS@... | 10/08/08
|
I thought that the headline in the email said
Mahegan | 10/08/08
|
$236m judgment isn't enough
twaynesdomain | 10/08/08
|
RE: $236m judgment against spammer couple
soul2skin@... | 10/08/08
|
Move up the food chain
preacherx | 10/08/08
|

Move up the food chain
missplaced | 10/08/08
|
RE: $236m judgment against spammer couple
Alro | 10/08/08
|
RE: $236m judgment against spammer couple
kuku2 | 10/08/08
|
RE: $236m judgment against spammer couple
Tim Pa | 10/08/08
|
RE: $236m judgment against spammer couple
IrishCharm | 10/08/08
|
RE: $236m judgment against spammer couple
halesan1 | 10/08/08
|
RE: $236m judgment against spammer couple
ramills1@... | 10/08/08
|
RE: $236m judgment against spammer couple
scottiedra | 10/08/08
|
We have no hope against spam, to little to late.
admin@... | 10/08/08
|
RE: $236m judgment against spammer couple
Ohioblue8514@... | 10/08/08
|
RE: $236m judgment against spammer couple
merlinof2 | 10/08/08
|
RE: $236m judgment against spammer couple
genlrel@... | 10/08/08
|
RE: $236m judgment against spammer couple
cbowers | 10/08/08
|
RE: $236m judgment against spammer couple
1Serve | 10/08/08
|
While Spam is a major problem on the internet...
melekali | 10/08/08
|
RE: $236m judgment against spammer couple
GHLatta5 | 10/08/08
|
RE: $236m judgment against spammer couple
DRKing | 10/08/08
|
Contract Prisoners Out
dean52@... | 10/08/08
|
RE: $236m judgment against spammer couple
jerry102 | 10/08/08
|
Death Sentence is too little
davetracer@... | 10/08/08
|
RE: $236m judgment against spammer couple
mezaleski | 10/08/08
|
Follow the money
madmike13 | 10/08/08
|
demonizing spammers
sirbennet | 10/08/08
|

Show me the stone pile...
coboldinosaur | 10/08/08
|

Demonizing Spammers???
lmenningen | 10/09/08
|
RE: $236m judgment against spammer couple
deowll | 10/08/08
|
Community service for life? viable solution?
raider00321 | 10/08/08
|
RE: $236m judgment against spammer couple
Marcopolish | 10/08/08
|
RE: $236m judgment against spammer couple
Marcopolish | 10/08/08
|
RE: $236m judgment against spammer couple
indevoter | 10/08/08
|
RE: $236m judgment against spammer couple
goose58431 | 10/08/08
|
RE: $236m judgment against spammer couple
philscbx@... | 10/08/08
|
RE: $236m judgment against spammer couple
glynn19 | 10/08/08
|
RE: Forget After-The-Fact Judgments
lmenningen | 10/09/08
|

So holding up quicky marts should be legal
bernalillo | 10/09/08
|
 
on the pain thing
missplaced | 10/09/08
|
RE: $236m judgment against spammer couple
catmedia | 10/09/08
|
RE: $236m judgment against spammer couple
mrblu45@... | 10/09/08
|

great idea,
vilppuu@... | 10/09/08
|

One Problem
hforman@... | 10/11/08
|
RE: $236m judgment against spammer couple
Mihail.a.dimitrov@... | 10/09/08
|
RE: $236m judgment against spammer couple
wallyj@... | 10/09/08
|
RE: $236m judgment against spammer couple
zcly | 10/10/08
|
RE: $236m judgment against spammer couple
zcly | 10/10/08
|
RE: $236m judgment against spammer couple
Jackbass@... | 10/10/08
|
RE: $236m judgment against spammer couple
josua24vs15@... | 10/11/08
|
RE: $236m judgment against spammer couple
hforman@... | 10/11/08
|