It's about money.
TripleII | 07/17/08
|
To us Texas bumkins ....
kd5auq | 07/17/08
|

News Flash: They already do...
Wolfie2K3 | 07/18/08
|
What a crock
riredale | 07/17/08
|
And they wonder
roaming | 07/17/08
|
RE: Beatles music saved from public domain!
SirLanse | 07/18/08
|

royalties
Silent Observer | 07/18/08
|

This is not about the copyrights on the songs themselves...
fairportfan | 07/20/08
|
RE: Beatles music saved from public domain!
jemd@... | 07/18/08
|
Its still "intellectual property" and they own it.
michaelspitz001@... | 07/18/08
|

The question is not the Beatles
rkoman@... | 07/18/08
|

So extending the copyright was a good thing?
John L. Ries | 07/18/08
|

WHAT WAS THE PURPOSE OF COPYRIGHT?
westks | 07/18/08
|
 
you are right of course
rkoman@... | 07/19/08
|
RE: Beatles music saved from public domain!
paul_wagner@... | 07/18/08
|

covered
rkoman@... | 07/18/08
|
RE: Beatles music saved from public domain!
celtxian | 07/18/08
|
RE: Beatles music saved from public domain!
biz.pleasure@... | 07/18/08
|
What happened to "extend protection FOR A TIME"?
mykmlr@... | 07/18/08
|

Yeah well this was already decided
rkoman@... | 07/19/08
|
RE: Beatles music saved from public domain!
m_a_massa@... | 07/18/08
|
Who Gets Paid For All That "Protection"?
jabailo1 | 07/18/08
|
RE: Beatles music saved from public domain!
compudiva | 07/19/08
|
RE: Beatles music saved from public domain!
rkoman@... | 07/19/08
|
BTW: The Beatles' copyrights...
tjbud | 07/21/08
|

Ownership of the Beatles' songs
jabster17 | 07/22/08
|