On BNET: Send self-destructing email
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 1 of 9:
Next »
Why pose
the spectacles of controversy, if all you can do is write about it ?

Most of the quantifiable material cant give any qualifyable relief. Since they are usually separate distinctive realities. If anything the FCC 'should be a beaureu (however you spell that) and not a commision.

Problem with the controversy being typically print publications have no kind of 'rearview.The controvery that is posed my simply drop from the sky as soon as the preposition of non apreciating conflicts are realized.

Guess Im doing anything but saying dont create a problem with another problem.But in many instances it is merely observation,that creates a respondance. The observaton is merely true.Not requiring any kind of reply in style of confrontive written opposites.

Print and news publications do not realize the negatives they have left behind wich are only true facets,with true futures howebeit they may have been posed as adversary rather than complementary. When the drawstrings are unlatched,the strength of the traits wich are consistent to that complement seem no longer relevant.

Heard a show from Art Bell on the am the other night. His guest - Loren Weinsteen did for the session in an hour the makeup of components for the computer user. Of wich took 4 years of simply reading from the ZDNET news here. They dont seem so adversary when they can be looked at recognized and defined. Spam,Spyware,RFID,Phishing,Personal Indemnity,Legalees,and so on.

Howebeit the interview was only a couple hours the substance of the topics covered areas of wich is completely pertinent to the users of the web. But the sadening part of it,was for all of its truth in the defining of those areas - is that most users do not have a single ascertaining aspect of life of wich to recognize them,..time.

The confusion is recognizing something of wich can be anticipated for adjusting to. Everybody is well intentioned to be enthusiastic about technology. So why not break the technology out ? Where the politics is at - who could know at any particular ..time.

But ya know,if ya could interview mr. Weinsteen yourself mr.mcullah maybe you would see what that rearview is.

I mean things are completely trashed.

...incidently a comment of the idea of VOIP was that - the same companies wich offer it,also have internet connectivity to consumers.

Just how that transposes into what Im doing now,writing to the talkback here.AND using a computer. Thinking that of course who is to be 'accomadating of 'my sense to this. Those who have not recognized it. Or those who can be 'provided to them (the senses) .. and so on.It goes on and on.

By now could be an old box of frogs.See ya.


-just talking.
Posted by: ParadigmOdyssey   Posted on: 06/14/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Why pose  ParadigmOdyssey | 06/14/04
What about our neighbors?  KD8K | 06/14/04
The Author does not know  cygnet@... | 06/21/04
We already have the means to enforce that law without the FCC.  mcunningham | 06/23/04
Those laws have to come from somewhere.  KD8K | 06/28/04
Censorship, parenting  techboy_z | 06/15/04
I disagree - somewhat  Patrick Jones | 06/16/04
FCC has lost its way  dmennie | 06/21/04
Homesteading rights  mcunningham | 06/23/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads