SCO will win the case! Darl McBride is my hero!
Bobby Sskcat | 03/09/04
|
 
SCO is getting the Legs Knocked from Under It!
Pegasus_z | 03/10/04
|
|
Perens is far from unbiased...
Mack DaNife | 03/09/04
|
|
There appears to be a lot of dirt here
Jay Cash | 03/09/04
|
|
There could be a backlash
voska | 03/09/04
|
|
Perens is not a lawyer either
StorageGuru | 03/09/04
|
|
Same old arguments
Jay Cash | 03/09/04
|
|
What gets me
OhMyGosh | 03/10/04
|
i doubt, they are ms employees...
ryusen | 03/10/04
|
|
Storing a lotta trolls are we, Storage Bit?...
Bobby Sskcat | 03/09/04
|
|
Re: Perens is not a lawyer either
issthatso | 03/09/04
|
|
Eben Moglen IS a lawyer.
Robert Crocker | 03/09/04
|
|
So why is it still in court?
StorageGuru | 03/09/04
|
|
RE: So why is it still in court?
nite_w0lf | 03/09/04
|
|
No rush
IT_User | 03/09/04
|
|
Silly thought
StorageGuru | 03/09/04
|
|
Just for laughs?
IT_User | 03/09/04
|
|
Chrysler case.
doe_z | 03/09/04
|
|
Why hasn't SCOX v. IBM been dismissed?
Yagotta B. Kidding | 03/09/04
|
|
It's as simple as an equation
George Jay | 03/09/04
|
|
AutoZone is a questionable defender of the issues
NemesisNL | 03/09/04
|
|
Dood....
plungermonkey@... | 03/10/04
|
|
Hey! StorageMan
nite_w0lf | 03/09/04
|
|
Neither are you...
Jose Jimenez | 03/09/04
|
|
SCO claims to have evidence
StorageGuru | 03/10/04
|
|
re:
ryusen | 03/10/04
|
|
Toadies???
Jose Jimenez | 03/10/04
|
|
Jose pays no attention
StorageGuru | 03/11/04
|
|
re:
ryusen | 03/11/04
|
|
Wishin' and hopin'
IT_User | 03/11/04
|
|
Perens is not a lawyer either
NoB$ | 03/09/04
|
|
Listen to the linux shill!!!
StorageGuru | 03/10/04
|
|
not quite!
dg mh | 03/09/04
|
|
RE: not quite!
nite_w0lf | 03/09/04
|
|
APIs
Font | 03/10/04
|
|
Don't bend over Daryl
Nigel Johnstone | 03/09/04
|
|
May be investigating...
Jay Cash | 03/09/04
|
|
BOFH
regwells | 03/09/04
|
|
I think in the end IBM will buy SCO after all
Michael Kelly | 03/09/04
|
|
Getting past the SEC...
Jay Cash | 03/09/04
|
|
Not a chance
Yagotta B. Kidding | 03/09/04
|
|
IBM will buy it.
doe_z | 03/09/04
|
|
What is this, realism?!
escoles@... | 03/11/04
|
|
Why?
NoB$ | 03/09/04
|
|
No!!!
glennhkboy | 03/09/04
|
|
Perens is no authority in my opinion
Mike Cox | 03/09/04
|
|
8.2
IT_User | 03/09/04
|
|
7.5
Jack-Booted EULA | 03/09/04
|
|
Where the action is
issthatso | 03/09/04
|
|
For Shame
regwells | 03/09/04
|
|
You know what I've noticed?
Michael Kelly | 03/09/04
|
|
WRONG!
Jack-Booted EULA | 03/09/04
|
|
This case has been a joke from the start
Chad_z | 03/09/04
|
|
String of ownership
jpgraves | 03/09/04
|
|
SCO's Case Has to do Largely with Copyright Infringment
P. Douglas | 03/09/04
|
|
Not exactly
Robert Crocker | 03/09/04
|
|
Not exactly either
StorageGuru | 03/09/04
|
|
Suddenly YOU'RE a lawyer? :-D
Robert Crocker | 03/09/04
|
|
Even better!
StorageGuru | 03/09/04
|
|
Even sillier
Robert Crocker | 03/09/04
|
|
It doesn't matter?
Yagotta B. Kidding | 03/09/04
|
|
No.
doe_z | 03/09/04
|
|
actually
ryusen | 03/09/04
|
|
what jury
hipparchus | 03/09/04
|
|
Re: Not exactly
P. Douglas | 03/09/04
|
|
Why?
Patrick Jones | 03/09/04
|
|
Re: Why?
P. Douglas | 03/09/04
|
|
I understand what you stated...
Patrick Jones | 03/09/04
|
|
I am with Patrick on this.
doe_z | 03/09/04
|
|
To: doe
P. Douglas | 03/09/04
|
|
argument of a buffoon
hipparchus | 03/09/04
|
|
I'm Not That Dumb
P. Douglas | 03/09/04
|
|
re:
ryusen | 03/09/04
|
|
re(2):
P. Douglas | 03/09/04
|
|
Derivation vs. Compatibility
Yagotta B. Kidding | 03/10/04
|
|
Re: Derivation vs. Compatibility
P. Douglas | 03/10/04
|
|
re: 3
ryusen | 03/10/04
|
|
Re: 4
P. Douglas | 03/11/04
|
|
re: 5
ryusen | 03/11/04
|
|
Today's lesson: WINE
Robert Crocker | 03/09/04
|
|
You mean *today*
IT_User | 03/09/04
|
|
IBM?s AIX code present in Linux also violates SCO?s Unix copyrights!wrong
nite_w0lf | 03/09/04
|
|
Do your homework
NoB$ | 03/09/04
|
|
In any case, this spells the end for proprietary Unix
George Mitchell | 03/09/04
|
|
You ignore the obvious, George
StorageGuru | 03/09/04
|
|
If SCO wins what?
Yagotta B. Kidding | 03/09/04
|
|
Unbelieveable
NoB$ | 03/09/04
|
|
Oh really
doctorrickb | 03/09/04
|
|
All of which will end up being controlled by SCO if they win
George Mitchell | 03/09/04
|
|
AT&T v BSD has already been settled in court. (NT)
Update victim | 03/17/04
|
|
SCO is the scratch-off lottery ticket
ejhonda | 03/09/04
|
|
Hey Bruce! Guess what?
Jack-Booted EULA | 03/09/04
|
|
since the halloween memo's release it's shot down to $10.15
hipparchus | 03/09/04
|
|
$9.47
IT_User | 03/10/04
|
|
Is SCO's case crumbling?
NoB$ | 03/09/04
|
|
The SCO - Microsoft connection
jellyclock | 03/10/04
|
|
SCO could not do this without Microsoft backing.
tero_t_vaananen@... | 03/10/04
|
|
Thanks for a Good Summary
Peter Komisar | 03/10/04
|
|
I find it amazing how
rkadowns | 03/10/04
|
|
IBM won't let it die
Eggs Ackley_z | 03/11/04
|
|
The Old AT&T Agreement
Inventor_z | 03/11/04
|
