On TechRepublic: Five super-secret features in Windows 7
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 1 of 27:
Next »
Off the Table
As such, there will be probably be a meeting this week or next involving Microsoft executives (like Office top dog Chris Capossela, who, at CES, answered my questions regarding this topic on video) who will weighing the changes that must be made to the ISO draft against the idea of simply providing real support for ODF in Microsoft Office. In either case, more capitulation will be involved.

There's really not much room for negotiation.

To the extent that the ISO objections focus on the process that brought ECMA-476 up for consideration, Microsoft has a chance to push through its specification.

If the subject turns to the actual technical content, there's no room for negotiation. ECMA-476 is a take-it-or-leave-it proposition, and if the ISO sends it back to ECMA for technical revisions the game is up -- because at that] point all pretense of the process being open evaporates.

The whole process then becomes one of Microsoft trying to keep all attention on the ECMA formal process and not on the working group's charter and away from technical issues at all costs. It's a high-risk strategy, though, because if they don't hold that line 100% their own attempts to focus on process turn against them.

The absolute worst-case scenario for Microsoft would be if ISO were to send 476 back to ECMA with instructions to open the spec up for real technical input and harmonization with existing standards -- and ECMA did. It's not likely, but at that point ECMA might decide that it had to choose between keeping Microsoft happy and keeping its favored status with ISO. Decisions, decisions.
Posted by: Yagotta B. Kidding   Posted on: 02/07/07 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Off the Table  Yagotta B. Kidding | 02/07/07
Industry standards and governments  zzz1234567890 | 02/07/07
Put them in their place  Yagotta B. Kidding | 02/07/07
Sarcasm? What sarcasm?  dberlind | 02/07/07
You know me, David  Yagotta B. Kidding | 02/07/07
Yah almost got me...  Cardinal_Bill | 02/07/07
Evil customers, heh?  super_J | 02/14/07
And presumably....  bportlock | 02/07/07
the defacto standard  zzz1234567890 | 02/07/07
The winning standard  Yagotta B. Kidding | 02/07/07
To hell with the customers!  George Mitchell | 02/07/07
the losers  code_Warrior | 02/07/07
Nice  Yagotta B. Kidding | 02/07/07
Wrong! Completely and utterly wrong!!  bportlock | 02/07/07
competition is the same in all fields  zzz1234567890 | 02/07/07
You're making the wrong comparison  bportlock | 02/08/07
But ODF doesn't get you there  DevGuy_z | 02/08/07
I couldn't care less ....  bportlock | 02/08/07
OpenOffice code is open  CWSmith1701 | 02/09/07
You're right  John L. Ries | 02/14/07
Have a more complete list of supporters.  B.O.F.H. | 02/14/07
Proofreading  Yagotta B. Kidding | 02/07/07
Any other  Yagotta B. Kidding | 02/07/07
More than marketting - problems with ODF  DevGuy_z | 02/08/07
Better defined??  techboy_z | 02/08/07
One line says it all...  shawkins | 02/14/07
ODF has been around for a while  aceofspades1217@... | 02/14/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Enterprise Applications

  • Check out some of the easiest and most powerful ways to boost productivity while saving money on your application infrastructure. See ZDNet's comprehensive Enterprise Application resource center, now!
  • New Online Dashboard
  • Read about top issues IT decision-makers face every day, plus get cost effective solutions to real life IT problems. Oracle Topline