On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 1 of 3:
Next »
SCA has to go a long way before it is an alternative to anything
The problem I have with SCA is simple: It is too much about framework and not enough about actually doing anything! Apart from Service Data Objects (SDO), it is all abstraction.

When somebody buys an ESB or even EAI product, they buy it for the features that fill specific functional requirements. Right now apart from SDO, SCA is rather like the Java Business Integration standard a year ago: a potentially good idea from an architecture point of view but rather difficult to figure out why somebody would actually buy a product purely because it is based on SCA.

Ronan Bradley
Posted by: ronanb   Posted on: 11/02/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

SCA has to go a long way before it is an alternative to anything  ronanb | 11/02/06
SOA does not mean BOA  jcamara | 11/03/06
Putting ESB, SCA, WCF, and EAI in the proper perspective  Dave_Chappell | 11/06/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here