On MovieTome: The next Spider-Man villain?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 22 of 53:
Next »
« Previous
The problem is...
...that it doesn't have to infringe. You have companies running around signing patent deals for pieces of Linux supposedly infringing on patents but don't know which ones. Now put Mono in the mix and its more room to use the same FUD scare tactics.
Posted by: storm14k   Posted on: 06/30/09 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Is this any different than Java?  happyharry_z | 06/30/09
Its quite different from Java.  storm14k | 06/30/09
Tired of political agendas  croberts | 06/30/09
Either a good act...  storm14k | 06/30/09
Apple has  mdemuth | 06/30/09
Then why don't they spread it?  storm14k | 06/30/09
Did they "really stuck with them"?  Richard Flude | 06/30/09
So, Apple's lean times were MS's fault somehow Richard?  xuniL_z | 06/30/09
Read what I said  Richard Flude | 07/01/09
I did Richard. You are still a very one sided thinker.  xuniL_z | 07/02/09
RE: Will Stallman C# warning fall flat?  someitguy79 | 06/30/09
RE: Will Stallman C# warning fall flat?  Icozinha | 06/30/09
Please get your facts right  honeymonster | 06/30/09
Whilst I mainly agree with you...  nick.holmes | 06/30/09
Except for one thing...  zkiwi | 06/30/09
Java has NOT been OSS'ed. Please catch up!  honeymonster | 06/30/09
As you said in your other post...  storm14k | 06/30/09
"More people want to see native code than anything"  xuniL_z | 06/30/09
Java will become legacy  onepersonsopinion@... | 06/30/09
@honeymonster. Nice post. You left him utterly speechless. NT  xuniL_z | 07/03/09
 xuniL_z | 07/06/09
The problem is...  storm14k | 06/30/09
RE: Will Stallman C# warning fall flat?  Icozinha | 06/30/09
ISO, Ecma and GPL  honeymonster | 06/30/09
Oh right, surrender to ISO and ECMA.  Icozinha | 06/30/09
Everyone saw the "bribery" charges coming the minute the ISO..  xuniL_z | 07/01/09
Mission accomplished  jackbond | 06/30/09
What?  Icozinha | 06/30/09
Answer the questions  jackbond | 06/30/09
Stupid  Icozinha | 06/30/09
It's simple...  jackbond | 06/30/09
Stupid again  Icozinha | 06/30/09
youve got a point  onepersonsopinion@... | 06/30/09
you really got a point!  Icozinha | 06/30/09
"Bing? Come on, m$ boy..." really?  xuniL_z | 06/30/09
Dana, I get tired of reading your flame bait.  balsover | 06/30/09
MS = antitrust  T1Oracle | 06/30/09
So, you still feel that way about IBM as well?  xuniL_z | 06/30/09
Why do they have a picture of a fat neanderthal on this blog??  xuniL_z | 06/30/09
Found him !!!  Aussie_Troll | 06/30/09
lol. I think that's him. (nt)  xuniL_z | 07/01/09
Another Take On Microsoft!  preachjohn | 06/30/09
Whatever  bmonsterman | 07/01/09
preachjohn. I must respond.  xuniL_z | 07/01/09
I give up! What's ABM mean?  preachjohn | 07/01/09
Anything But Microsoft (ABM)  rapson | 07/01/09
I'm obviously not an ABMer! Ah Whatever!  preachjohn | 07/01/09
I'm trying to believe you, but one fact remains.  xuniL_z | 07/01/09
I just calls'em as I sees'em  bmonsterman | 07/02/09
Zdnet posts suck  jackbond | 07/01/09
RE: Will Stallman C# warning fall flat?  ITsupportGuy | 07/02/09
RE: Will Stallman C# warning fall flat?  mheartwood | 07/03/09
RE: Will Stallman C# warning fall flat?  nachokb | 07/08/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads