On CBS.com: Surivor Exclusive Secret Scenes
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 6 of 59:
Next »
« Previous
aren't used?
I would like to see your stats on what makes you think automatic update services aren't used on Linux distros. Your claim seems completely ludicrous to me. It appears based on assumptions.

Here we don't directly use our vendor's software update repository. Its a drain on bandwidth to have a bunch of machines hitting the Internet for software patches we can mirror internally. But we still use the built-in automatic update service and we force the machines to install all updates it finds. But we rsync our vendor's APT repository internally every day and can decide whether or not to disable certain updates. We also deploy our own applications and update them automatically using APT. Its quite reliable and seamless and anyone who doesn't use something similar is insane. Its so exceedingly trivial to setup that I can't fathom people would disable it.

The users have no choice in the matter, either. Whatever updates I place on our internal APT repository get installed that evening by all the machines. At worst, the user may have to reboot the next day if its a kernel update. And the system warns the user of that fact at login and via periodic notification bubbles.
Posted by: cabdriverjim   Posted on: 01/02/09 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Automatic updates.  Bilmekanikeren | 01/01/09
Most aren't used  DanaBlankenhorn ZDNet Moderator | 01/01/09
We Fix it  tracy anne | 01/01/09
Have you just received $100,000 dollars into your bank Dana?  Amelioration | 01/01/09
Heh. This *does* look like a placed piece.  masonwheeler | 01/05/09
aren't used?  cabdriverjim | 01/02/09
Most aren't used? Firefox pushes  Greenknight_z | 01/06/09
Patently false  jeverettk | 02/04/09
Ok -- lets audit some text ..... shall we..  boredsillyinedu | 01/01/09
RE: The biggest threat to open source in 2009  boredsillyinedu | 01/01/09
Most aren't used like, Redhat updates?  n0neXn0ne | 01/01/09
If I didn't know you better  Ole Man | 01/01/09
Dana is fishing for Marlin today. You know him; I know him;  no_zd_user_name | 01/02/09
RE: The biggest threat to open source in 2009  V@... | 01/01/09
were you born stupid, or do you work at it?  Anonymous Benefactor | 01/01/09
the poor guy is going to blame health care now for his stupidity  code_Warrior | 01/01/09
RE: The biggest threat to open source in 2009  mr4thjuly | 01/01/09
RE: The biggest threat to open source in 2009  tracy anne | 01/01/09
Are you talking about Open Source programs on Windows?  TripleII | 01/01/09
RE: The biggest threat to open source in 2009  theironlion | 01/01/09
RE: The biggest threat to open source in 2009  TonyMY | 01/01/09
RE: The biggest threat to open source in 2009  rikasa | 01/01/09
Dana is referring only to Enterprise level ???? I don't think so.  TonyOz | 01/02/09
@TonyOz  rikasa | 01/02/09
Well answered rikasa  TonyOz | 01/02/09
happy  rikasa | 01/02/09
For RH this is one  markdean | 01/02/09
Mandriva Corporate Server uses urpmi --parallel.  tracy anne | 01/02/09
Which proves how easy...  KimTjik | 01/02/09
It's never stated  tracy anne | 01/02/09
Thanks  rikasa | 01/02/09
Trivially Simple.  TripleII | 01/02/09
Dana you're absolutely right!  Amelioration | 01/01/09
BullS#%!  vmaatta | 01/02/09
Dana are you hung over ?  Alan Smithie | 01/02/09
RE: The biggest threat to open source in 2009  earthy | 01/02/09
RE: The biggest threat to open source in 2009  markdean | 01/02/09
RE: The biggest threat to open source in 2009  jester41@... | 01/02/09
Red Hat subscriptions...  Henrik Moller | 01/02/09
I think what Dana means to say...  cabdriverjim | 01/02/09
Why do I feel like...  cabdriverjim | 01/02/09
$100,000 divvied up between us. Ah, that would be nice. wink (nt)  V@... | 01/02/09
RE: The biggest threat to open source in 2009  rnojonson@... | 01/02/09
Dana, What tha...  hamobu | 01/02/09
This article is *so* wrong it has to be flamebait  jhoderd | 01/02/09
ZDNet has lost all credibility.  goban22 | 01/02/09
Dana, Dana, DANA!  teddybairs1 | 01/03/09
RE: The biggest threat to open source in 2009  scouser73 | 01/03/09
Uninformed FUD or blatant lie?  Slated | 01/03/09
ZDNet...do you check your bloggers credentials?  storm14k | 01/03/09
RE: The biggest threat to open source in 2009  Open means Good | 01/03/09
Time to re-title the story.  TripleII | 01/03/09
RE: The biggest threat to open source in 2009  triclone | 01/04/09
Not too big of deal IMO  NegativeElectrons | 01/05/09
RE: The biggest threat to open source in 2009  Bilmekanikeren | 01/05/09
RE: The biggest threat to open source in 2009  shadfurman | 01/05/09
Large Open Source update services exist  robsku | 01/08/09
Name three, please.  paron | 01/09/09
RE: The biggest threat to open source in 2009  ernestpark | 02/13/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More