On TechRepublic: 10 cool USB flash drive tricks
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 3 of 10:
Next »
« Previous
de facto standard
Given that OOXML is the likely de facto standard, ODF by the wayside, wouldn't full interoperability mean that OpenOffice.org was able to do everything Office can using the version of OOXML Microsoft currntly(sic) uses?

Oh, but how can OOXML be the "de facto standard" when not a single office productivity application implements ISO-approved OOXML. You know darn well that all the current aaax formats used by Microsoft Office 2007 are in fact not what the ISO approved, and even Microsoft itself has claimed they will implement ODF in Office before they attempt to implement OOXML (ISO/IEC 29500).

See http://www.sdtimes.com/content/article.aspx?ArticleID=32228
Posted by: NetArch.   Posted on: 08/20/08 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

On the outside looking in  D. T. Schmitz | 08/20/08
"I am merely a neutral observer..." Merely?  Anton Philidor | 08/20/08
de facto standard  NetArch. | 08/20/08
You did notice the "currently"...  Anton Philidor | 08/20/08
Why?  zkiwi | 08/20/08
A very interesting dance indeed. Creating operability problems and at the  DonnieBoy | 08/20/08
Paula Rooney, you really don't believe these MS talking points, do you?  zaine_ridling | 08/20/08
RE: Novell look sweeter to IT shops?  geek49203_z | 08/21/08
Backwards!!  techboy_z | 08/21/08
OOXML -- dead format walking?  Ole Man | 08/30/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement
Click Here