On mySimon: Say You're One of Them
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 1 of 11:
Next »
I would say .."not exactly"
This isnt the same case of outright blocking (as we all know and have come to love Comcast for doing)...however this is adding a perceived "added-value" to an overpriced pipe. IF the ISP decided to tier this and add in a method of authorizing those who have paid for the special tier (or package even)- its no more than paying your cable or satellite operator for HBO/STARZ, et all.
Posted by: JT82   Posted on: 08/19/08 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

I would say .."not exactly"  JT82 | 08/19/08
That is another way of doing it...  DanaBlankenhorn ZDNet Moderator | 08/19/08
Which is sad...  JT82 | 08/19/08
Just like Comcast has done for years  robbieharrison@... | 08/19/08
Comcast has some real competition in video  DanaBlankenhorn ZDNet Moderator | 08/19/08
But only in video.  colinmeister | 08/20/08
RE: Can sites violate net neutrality?  robb@... | 08/19/08
my isp all ready offers something like this but you have to opt in and  SO.CAL Guy | 08/20/08
RE: Can sites violate net neutrality?  seale.terry@... | 08/20/08
Not just ESPN 360 - AT&T's full list of  djchandler | 08/21/08
Why not charge "shopping channels"?  kd5auq | 08/29/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here