Open Source can help temprarily
wackoae | 04/04/08
|

Yup, and even the "cheapest" IT salaries
fr0thy2 | 04/04/08
|

Is Open Source for Windows?
jns_45K@... | 04/09/08
|
the other way
emromero@... | 04/04/08
|

Windows' moves address your concern
DanaBlankenhorn | 04/04/08
|
 
It's always a lot more twitting about on Windows
fr0thy2 | 04/04/08
|
Dubious strategy
John L. Ries | 04/04/08
|
RE: Is open source for Windows worthwhile?
joe_pan5@... | 04/04/08
|

Agreed
DanaBlankenhorn | 04/04/08
|
RE: Is open source for Windows worthwhile?
joe_pan5@... | 04/04/08
|
WinSource?
Norcross | 04/04/08
|

You missed the whole OOXML debate
fr0thy2 | 04/04/08
|

RE: "what's so secret...?"
AndyCee | 04/04/08
|
Worthwhile in what way?
No_Ax_to_Grind | 04/04/08
|

Of course you wouldn't see the point No_Ax
fr0thy2 | 04/04/08
|
 
And that's your best thought out and articulated reply?
No_Ax_to_Grind | 04/04/08
|
  
Surely 99% of the article must have gone over your head
fr0thy2 | 04/04/08
|
 
NAG is right
John L. Ries | 04/04/08
|
Open source on Windows is good. It gives Windows users an easy migration
DonnieBoy | 04/04/08
|

Naw, its good because its cheap
No_Ax_to_Grind | 04/05/08
|
 
What's good because it's cheap No_Ax?
fr0thy2 | 04/05/08
|
 
Not sure that "cheap" has anything to do with "cheap", but MS is getting a
DonnieBoy | 04/06/08
|
No, those who see this religiously will not allow
Boot_Agnostic | 04/06/08
|