On last.fm: Green Day - Listen free and discover!
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 6 of 7:
Next »
« Previous
Web-as-OS vs, virtual PCs
There's enough desktop power to shell OSs as "applications" within a host OS, and thus support your applications of choice, regardless of OS. The downside is the extra cost of OS licenses, and the currently non-seamless nature of this process.

The advantage of this over using the web as application UI/API, is that you don't dissolve the edge between your system and "the cloud".

Given the current malware situation, including the infection of web host servers, there's a large suspension of disbelief required to swallow the re-packaged "Net PC" concept of SaaS and data held in "the cloud".

Do you really want to entrust your data safety and privacy to a server under someone else's control - or wherever else this is either subcontracted or maliciously re-directed?
Posted by: cquirke   Posted on: 03/27/08 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Mark, YES PLEASE!!  itanalyst2@... | 03/26/08
LOL! wink  GuidingLight | 03/26/08
RE: Ubuntu's Shuttleworth: Linux server, client will be big in the cloud an  pareshm | 03/26/08
RE: Ubuntu's Shuttleworth: Linux server, client will be big in the cloud an  MarkHarrison | 03/26/08
Fix your broken comment system, please?  cquirke | 03/27/08
Web-as-OS vs, virtual PCs  cquirke | 03/27/08
One big browser kiosk?  John Musbach | 04/01/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
Click Here
advertisement

Meet Doc