On UrbanBaby: Nanny vs. Daycare. Discuss!
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 1 of 11:
Next »
There's a huge difference between this and closed proprietary
Using the example in your link, if Red Hat refuses support because I change the source code, I still have the source code, and I can still find a competitor who is more willing to play ball. I'm generally okay with these companies because they are upfront about the services they provide, and that kind of honesty is all you can really expect out of service providers (along with how well they do the things they are willing to do for you). You know upfront what you they will provide, and if it does not meet your needs you can take the ball and find another player.

And remember, you get what you pay for. The software code may be free as in beer, but an overall software solution never is. With Red Hat you pay for cookie cutter results. If you need hand crafted results you need to pony up for that.
Posted by: Michael Kelly   Posted on: 01/31/08 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

There's a huge difference between this and closed proprietary  Michael Kelly | 01/31/08
I agree...  DanaBlankenhorn ZDNet Moderator | 01/31/08
Can always branch out of the closed open source  s_souche | 01/31/08
Is this really much different than any other open source project?  criderja | 01/31/08
Go back to my incline  DanaBlankenhorn ZDNet Moderator | 01/31/08
Pointless ...  George Mitchell | 01/31/08
I have to agree  masonwheeler | 02/01/08
Yawn. Wake me when there's a real story [nt]  Omch'Ar | 01/31/08
Do we need to fight?  andrew53 | 02/01/08
GPL is propriatory software  uno@... | 02/02/08
Embrace the Necessity  zero | 02/04/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement