On mySimon: Hunter Wellies Rain Boots For Men
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 1 of 7:
Next »
Higher up the tree
The underlying question remains this. Is standards-setting a judicial or a political process? Even if it is a judicial process, should such a process ignore politics, or be informed by it?

I beg to differ. The underlying question is, "what is the desired output of the standards process?"

That, itself, is indisputbly a political question. Until we can agree on objectives, though, discussions of means are at best inefficient and at worst totally pointless.

I suspect that a great deal of the noise on this subject has resulted from people arguing means as a proxy for ends, and thus wasting time talking past each other.
Posted by: Yagotta B. Kidding   Posted on: 12/14/07 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Higher up the tree  Yagotta B. Kidding | 12/14/07
Standards are Voluntary in US and many other places  orcmid | 12/14/07
In the end, it did come down to politics...  laxmanb | 12/14/07
Standards are badly needed  itguy08 | 12/14/07
Standards setting is political by definition  John L. Ries | 12/14/07
Standards spectrum  Yagotta B. Kidding | 12/14/07
No paradox  John L. Ries | 12/14/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
Premier Vendor Content Whitepapers, webcasts & resources from our Power Center Sponsors
advertisement
Click Here

SmartPlanet

Click Here