On mySimon: Prince Rocking Horse
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 1 of 74:
Next »
Time will tell whether MS are telling the truth
Though it strikes me that if they are behind the current lawsuit, they did a very bad job of covering their tracks.
Posted by: John L. Ries   Posted on: 10/17/07 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Time will tell whether MS are telling the truth  John L. Ries | 10/17/07
In any case, patent suites will tend to clean up Linux over time and remove  DonnieBoy | 10/17/07
Ah, so you accept that Linux needs to be "cleaned up"  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/17/07
Right, with all of the garbage patents out there that will be invalidated,  DonnieBoy | 10/17/07
I can understand your "HOPING" it works out  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/17/07
It will not help Microsft it Red Hat hast to pay millions. But, in the end  DonnieBoy | 10/17/07
Sure it does...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/17/07
If any IP questoins are taken care of one at a time, that does NOT benifit  DonnieBoy | 10/17/07
Well, it looks like  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/17/07
In any case, if this were closed source, you could attach to the assets of  DonnieBoy | 10/17/07
And I am betting  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/17/07
Beware your betting, Axey  Sabz5150 | 10/18/07
GPL in microsoft?  davidaforshaw@... | 10/18/07
Never said that it wasn't  John L. Ries | 10/17/07
Again,  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/17/07
Again, this is all related news since it is all about patents and Linux.  DonnieBoy | 10/17/07
Again, you do not need to be a legal exper to understand what is vague.  DonnieBoy | 10/17/07
Again, winning a lawsuit does not instantly make things that were vague and  DonnieBoy | 10/17/07
Me thinks thou dost protest too much.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/17/07
No protesting, just noting the reality of the situation. The reality is we  DonnieBoy | 10/17/07
What a joke  ChMacQueen@... | 10/18/07
Operation has been initiated...  Mike Cox | 10/17/07
Wow.  James T. Kirk | 10/17/07
Drum roll...10  D. T. Schmitz | 10/17/07
9.0 (NT)  P. Douglas | 10/17/07
9.0  BanjoPaterson | 10/17/07
9.5, but no fish --- so far...  Basic Logic | 10/17/07
If I were conspiracy-minded  rapson | 10/17/07
Since this could backfire, I wonder if Microsoft really wanted it. For the  DonnieBoy | 10/17/07
Junk patents ...  George Mitchell | 10/17/07
speaking of junk patents  Jack-Booted EULA | 10/17/07
You base that on what???  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/17/07
You don't have to be a patent lawyer to realize vague general patents when  DonnieBoy | 10/17/07
No, you don't, but it sure helps  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/17/07
Read the patents, they are very questionable, very general.  DonnieBoy | 10/17/07
Is that your "legal" opinion?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/17/07
And, we do NOT need "real" courts or "real" jurys to understand a patent is  DonnieBoy | 10/17/07
Sorry, but the law says you do.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/17/07
Court rulings to not make vague and general patents suddenly  DonnieBoy | 10/17/07
It really makes no difference what a "real court" and "real jury" say ....  George Mitchell | 10/17/07
Re: Since this could backfire, I wonder if Microsoft really wanted it. For  none none | 10/17/07
This case is just full of coincidences!  George Mitchell | 10/17/07
Shouldn't that be grounds for recusing the judge?  Tony Agudo | 10/17/07
Good point  John L. Ries | 10/17/07
In almost all cases, that is up to the judge.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/17/07
Prudent businessmen choose the cost effective solution ...  George Mitchell | 10/17/07
there's a saying about Danegeld  A.Lizard | 10/18/07
In this case, however...  Tony Agudo | 10/17/07
Actually, it's a good strategy to let it go  maldain | 10/19/07
How does it matter either way?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/17/07
If a connection could be proved, there would be a lot of negative press  DonnieBoy | 10/17/07
Negative press with WHO?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/17/07
Glad you think that MS is immune to negative press. Meanwhile, about every  DonnieBoy | 10/17/07
ROTFLMAO  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/17/07
Negative press for "picking" on Linux???  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/17/07
Getting caught lying would NOT be good for Microsoft. Companies DO need to  DonnieBoy | 10/17/07
Sorry but again you are wrong.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/17/07
interesting question...  sj_z | 10/18/07
I'm not conspiracy-minded  DemonX | 10/17/07
To the curious co-incidence of the Ballmer at the conference.  BanjoPaterson | 10/17/07
Uh huh ... Sure ... Yeah ...  OButterball | 10/17/07
Microsoft said the same about SCO  shoktai@... | 10/17/07
Ever played chess?  Sabz5150 | 10/18/07
YEAH RIGHT  kokuryu | 10/17/07
Acacia, a troublemaker organization  OKJoe | 10/17/07
What doe they mean by "a party"?  john_whitfield@... | 10/17/07
All patents must die [nt]  Omch'Ar | 10/17/07
RE: MS too precious by half  rkhalloran | 10/18/07
RE: OIN patent protection?  rkhalloran | 10/18/07
Microsoft does not accuse ...  msdead | 10/18/07
RE: Microsoft claims it is not party to patent claims against Linux  k.ide@... | 10/21/07
regardless of the merrit  Altotus | 10/22/07
woops  Altotus | 10/22/07
Perhaps  John Musbach | 11/13/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
Click Here
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here