On last.fm: Radiohead - Listen free and discover!
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 1 of 11:
Next »
I voted "Ok, but I wouldn't use them"
I voted "Ok, but I wouldn't use them" because there's already a whole spectrum of open source licenses to choose from(GPL, MIT, BSD, MPL, etc). That's not to say I wouldn't use Ms-PL or Ms-RL licensed software(I kinda like IronPython, for example), but I'd rather pick a more community-established license when releasing my own software.

It's quite possible that they may not gain much traction outside of Microsoft-related projects, so let's just wait and see how they fare.
Posted by: Tony Agudo   Posted on: 10/16/07 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

I voted "Ok, but I wouldn't use them"  Tony Agudo | 10/16/07
the reciprocal license has advantages  Resuna | 10/17/07
To each his/her own, then  Tony Agudo | 10/17/07
It was a risky move  mannyamador | 10/17/07
They're OK, but...  robert.paul@... | 10/17/07
They're OK and Microsoft is still evil.  Resuna | 10/17/07
OMG - that was very prolific...sheesh  socialism=nowhere | 10/17/07
Someone made the statement  Ole Man | 10/17/07
RE: OSI and M$  back_atcha | 10/17/07
Other OSI licenses preferable for me  orcmid | 10/17/07
OSI and Microsoft Licenses  Starbase Commander | 10/21/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
Click Here
advertisement

Meet Doc

  • Here to help you with your Document Management Needs
  • Doc is an enigma. Born to a Russian ballerina and a German electrical engineer, he grew up in various locations in the United States. He’s seen the insides of more brands, versions, and generations of printer and printer-related hardware than almost anyone.
  • To learn more about this mysterious figure check out his blog on ZDNet and his Workspace on TechRepublic. You’ll be glad you did.
  • Produced by
    ZDNet and