On mySimon: The Double-Daring Book for Girls
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 1 of 19:
Next »
Patent Neurality
Microsoft wants "net neutrality" so shouldn't it be pusing for "patent neutrality?"

What's good for the goose is good for the gander!
Posted by: mnpundit   Posted on: 08/25/06 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Patent Neurality  mnpundit | 08/25/06
What is Microsoft's position?  rapson | 08/25/06
EFF & MS on the same side here  Edward Meyers | 08/25/06
As well they should be.  dave.leigh@... | 08/25/06
obviousness v prior art  pcrh | 08/26/06
Microsoft using EFF  rjriley@... | 08/25/06
Yeah, sure...  Tim Patterson | 08/26/06
Where to begin?  pcrh | 08/26/06
Why?  Swashbuckler2 | 08/27/06
Patenting Math  DanaBlankenhorn ZDNet Moderator | 08/28/06
Not Math - Proofs  stormculture | 08/28/06
Except they really have patented math  Edward Meyers | 08/28/06
Actually, It's Not So Hard....  The-Jetman | 08/28/06
A little more than math.  osreinstall | 08/29/06
It could also be taht software belongs under Copywrite and not Patent.  B.O.F.H. | 08/26/06
Uh, it is  Swashbuckler2 | 08/27/06
What Came First  DanaBlankenhorn ZDNet Moderator | 08/28/06
Um, that's...  Colonel Panijk | 08/28/06
The law don't work. E*M*U*L*E***P*2*P***F*I*L*E*S*H*A*R*I*N*G  GreatInca | 08/28/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
Premier Vendor Content Whitepapers, webcasts & resources from our Power Center Sponsors
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here