On CBS MoneyWatch: 6 things NOT to do on Twitter, Facebook
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 1 of 35:
Next »
In a world...
...of specialists, the vast majority are uninformed. And Tyranny by the majority is still tyranny. I think the wikipedia issue is most thorny because of a lack of humility. On everyone's side. Wikifanatics and evangalists (a term that SHOULD BE pejoritive) for their presumption of authority and blind to Wikipedia's inherent weaknesses. And the Traditional authority's (in whatever area) desire to come off as beyond reproach and lacking the possibility of accidental mistake or purposeful corruption.

Openness is valueable in dealing with corruption. We need to be mindful of its' weaknesses however. We need to recognize that truth by committee of uninformed is not necessarily, a better outcome.
Posted by: Zinoron   Posted on: 12/14/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

In a world...  Zinoron | 12/14/05
Deconstructing the Consensus Argument  srdiamond | 12/14/05
You seem to assume someone even cares.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/14/05
It's not?  rapson | 12/14/05
Peer and open review  palmwarrior | 12/14/05
Defining open access publishing  palmwarrior | 12/14/05
Inaccurate Quote, otherwise interesting  zztong | 12/14/05
Open Source vs. Open Information  Erik1234 | 12/14/05
Except WikiPedia Is Acurate Also  Edward Meyers | 12/15/05
Misinformation rules  sandpiper | 12/14/05
The academy vs. open source  mck22 | 12/14/05
Let's Get This Strait  lbattis@... | 12/14/05
Good call, but more detail would have helped  The_Q | 12/14/05
"Authority figure" has mutiple meanings, be careful  Justin James | 12/14/05
Agreed but,  OldGreyGeek | 12/15/05
history  glocks out | 12/14/05
Inherntly corrupt  code_flogger | 12/14/05
Glass houses  Gravitas@... | 12/14/05
Mistaken Comparison  Tony T3 | 12/14/05
Academia is an intellectual clap trap  daver_z | 12/14/05
Open what?  Martin.Taylor@... | 12/15/05
Wikipedia/Open Source  mpmdbt | 12/15/05
It is incredible  oldTVtech | 12/15/05
A modest proposal  cd2_z | 12/15/05
addendum to modest proposal  wdlists@... | 12/15/05
Is anyone actually thinking?  Reged | 12/15/05
nonsense  daver_z | 12/15/05
Wikipedia is not open  skellmeyer | 12/15/05
No it's open source  daver_z | 12/15/05
Know your source!!!  mwagner@... | 12/15/05
Scientific method  jrickett | 12/15/05
Exactly...  FatherJ | 01/13/06
Wikipedia Scientific Method  marlinj@... | 12/15/05
Whose Standards, Whose Values?  rjshanley | 12/16/05
we need both  aif@... | 12/17/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here