On The Insider: Criminal Past of Woods Mistress Revealed
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 1 of 18:
Next »
Protectign trademarks like Linux and Windows is impotant.
Reagardless which you happen to like.

Curious, which "trademark" would have been infringed upon more by Lindows?
Posted by: No_Ax_to_Grind   Posted on: 08/21/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Protectign trademarks like Linux and Windows is impotant.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/21/05
As soon as MS contacted them...  Anti_Zealot | 08/22/05
Don't be so defensive, I asked a simple question.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/22/05
Interesting thought..  Patrick Jones | 08/22/05
I always have a hard time with figuring out trademarks.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/22/05
I have no problem with it being "commercial"  Patrick Jones | 08/22/05
Nor I Patrick, in fact I think it's a done deal.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/22/05
Look at the fee schedule  DanaBlankenhorn ZDNet Moderator | 08/22/05
Timeline?  rapson | 08/22/05
If there is a trademark..  Patrick Jones | 08/22/05
One reason for the settlement with "Lindows"...  Anton Philidor | 08/22/05
Protect the word Linux from abuse?  Wagadonga | 08/22/05
I've got an idea  Roger Ramjet | 08/22/05
And then...  zztong | 08/22/05
Actually, it's long over.  Taz_z | 08/22/05
Damn, they changed the talkback again  Taz_z | 08/22/05
What should Lius pay them then?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/22/05
What does this response have to do with anything?  Taz_z | 08/22/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here