Great article
ross2000 | 02/27/07
|

MHz wasn't a myth, it just had limits
georgeou | 02/27/07
|
 
Yes there is George...
Linux User 147560 | 02/27/07
|
  
Absolute statements are refuge of ignorant
georgeou | 02/27/07
|
   
Are you calling me ignorant?
Linux User 147560 | 02/27/07
|
    
Are you saying GHz doesn't matter?
georgeou | 02/27/07
|
    
You prefer AMD? Surprise surprise.
Cayble | 02/28/07
|
   
Extremists
Sxooter_z | 02/28/07
|
    
...counselling someone to commit an indictable
Feldwebel Wolfenstool | 02/28/07
|
Optional Illusion
D. T. Schmitz | 02/27/07
|

You're not an uber geek?!?!
georgeou | 02/27/07
|
 
Take your pick...
D. T. Schmitz | 02/27/07
|
 
Take your pick...
D. T. Schmitz | 02/27/07
|
Going up rather than down
TonyMcS | 02/27/07
|

Thanks, photos are precious
georgeou | 02/27/07
|
A minor quibble
j.m.galvin | 02/27/07
|

Downsizing is right, but you are downsampling
georgeou | 02/27/07
|
 
Megapixel = noun
David Pogue | 02/28/07
|
  
Your example is an exception
georgeou | 02/28/07
|
  
come on now
mindilator@... | 02/28/07
|
  
Excuse me...
cwhard@... | 03/01/07
|
One thing to watch out for
CobraA1 | 02/27/07
|

Digital zoom is a different scam
georgeou | 02/27/07
|

Number of pixels not the only factor
DNSB | 03/01/07
|
Pogue replies... not quite the last word
David Pogue | 02/27/07
|

My reply to David Pogue
georgeou | 02/27/07
|
 
Easier blogged than done
David Pogue | 02/27/07
|
  
You're criticizing me for not testing!?!?!?
georgeou | 02/28/07
|
   
Deepest apologies
David Pogue | 02/28/07
|
    
Again, hairy arms or EIA charts
georgeou | 02/28/07
|
     
Hey...
rlavere | 02/28/07
|
  
Welcome to the World of Ou
frgough | 02/28/07
|
   
Ya, lets talk about that exploit
Cayble | 02/28/07
|
  
Test it yourself
solyom@... | 03/01/07
|
   
Foveon and cropping
georgeou | 03/01/07
|

No visible difference
frgough | 02/28/07
|
 
You must know some really stupid professors
macbill | 02/28/07
|
  
Smart professors
Geek3001 | 03/01/07
|

Right On!
BCADMINISTRATOR | 02/28/07
|

Dave: You should have used a different printer
j.m.galvin | 02/28/07
|

No Visible difference
michaelejahn | 02/28/07
|
 
The problem is that he's using the hairy arm photo
georgeou | 02/28/07
|
Mega-Pixel are worthless!
The Rifleman | 02/27/07
|

If 200 DPI is good enough for your eyes and you don't need to crop
georgeou | 02/27/07
|

Is the D-70 an amatuer camera? You treat it like one.
felix52 | 02/28/07
|
Pixels are resolution Mr. Ou
FirstNLastN | 02/28/07
|
Thanks!
duerstad@... | 02/28/07
|
Amount of Light Captured = Resolution
Phuoc.H.Thai@... | 02/28/07
|

Stunning they may be
solyom@... | 03/01/07
|
Well...they gotta sell SOMETHING new and "improved"
Feldwebel Wolfenstool | 02/28/07
|
Good for many, but not most.
filipiak | 02/28/07
|
Megapixels & noise
c.whitfield@... | 02/28/07
|

Bad assumptions
georgeou | 02/28/07
|
 
You again mislead people
kvo | 03/02/07
|
Megapixel Poopery
keithbutler | 02/28/07
|

Just wait until you need pixels...
macbill | 02/28/07
|
 
Pogue even admits to the need for more megapixels when cropping
georgeou | 02/28/07
|
It's all about the printing.
woja | 02/28/07
|
but, is it art?
keithz@... | 02/28/07
|
Equating optics and sensor is important
todd@... | 02/28/07
|
From an advanced user's viewpoint
K4thwright | 02/28/07
|
DP's far more "correct" here than Ou
blunderdog | 02/28/07
|
Resolution yes, print size related to megapixels NO
jakharve | 02/28/07
|

You blew it twice
macbill | 03/01/07
|
 
Yup, it's the angle of view covered, not the size
georgeou | 03/01/07
|
11 megapixels don't have to put you in the $4000+ range!
iedsri@... | 02/28/07
|

I was talking about SLRs
georgeou | 03/01/07
|
 
becareful of what you are measuring
woot! | 03/02/07
|
  
Just an FYI
woot! | 03/02/07
|
Definition of "Better"
it@... | 02/28/07
|

Good write up, just want to correct you on something
georgeou | 03/01/07
|

A poor standard of quality!
macbill | 03/01/07
|
At last!
Bob Allen_z | 03/01/07
|
megapixels........
RTedrow | 03/01/07
|

Pogue even admits to the cropping exception
georgeou | 03/01/07
|
Megapixels *not* a myth!
kmurray@... | 03/01/07
|
All very scientific but...
prayerfire | 03/01/07
|
Whole discussion is academic
theoldman59 | 03/01/07
|

Camera Mastery
Geek3001 | 03/01/07
|
 
I think you have the right idea
theoldman59 | 03/01/07
|
  
The right tools for the job
Geek3001 | 03/01/07
|
Distances and pixel density
Geek3001 | 03/01/07
|
Post processing with the printer
Geek3001 | 03/01/07
|

Printers always rescale to optimum resolution
georgeou | 03/01/07
|
One Megapixel rating does NOT fit all needs
theoldman59 | 03/01/07
|
You were called and raised.
deowll | 03/01/07
|
Megapixels ARE a myth
stanaland | 03/01/07
|

Possible price typo
Geek3001 | 03/02/07
|

Ditto on the CRT viewing area scam
georgeou | 03/02/07
|
He is just doing his job!
kvo | 03/02/07
|
Not all [pixels are created equal
gizmog | 03/02/07
|

True, But Ignored in this Blog
blunderdog | 03/02/07
|
megapixels
donclogan | 03/02/07
|
Hardly the last word
prayerfire | 03/03/07
|
Your All Doing Your Readers a Disservice!
Gray_Beard | 03/05/07
|
CCD size and resolution
c.edwards@... | 03/16/07
|

You can always downsample to equalize the noise
georgeou | 03/18/07
|
megapixels are practical...
gunnarh | 03/28/07
|
More Megapixels give you more options, for SURE, but...
Jeff Hayes | 04/01/07
|
QQ Moar, Ou
Regyrge | 04/04/07
|
RE: The final word on the 'megapixel myth'
a1931582 | 11/22/09
|