Not again George, tsk tsk...
Scrat | 11/06/06
|

As George said....
bportlock | 11/06/06
|
 
I often connect WinXP SP2 laptops to the Internet directly
tshinder@... | 11/06/06
|
Right on George!
tshinder@... | 11/06/06
|
I don't care what anybody thinks
D. T. Schmitz | 11/06/06
|
Of course
jragosta | 11/06/06
|
Objectively Speaking
nucrash | 11/06/06
|

Thanks for the info
georgeou | 11/06/06
|
Re: Robert Cringely shows blatant ignorance of networking
none none | 11/06/06
|

IPV6 is coming
nucrash | 11/06/06
|
 
As far as IPv6 hardware is concerned
zkiwi | 11/06/06
|
  
How can they capitalize on the shift?
nucrash | 11/06/06
|

Go read it again, he said we would have run out years ago
georgeou | 11/06/06
|
 
You didn't quote him saying that. (NT)
none none | 11/06/06
|
  
Doesn't change the fact that he said it
georgeou | 11/06/06
|

Right, and a little wrong
joej_6url.com | 11/11/06
|
 
Most writers have a pen name
osreinstall | 11/11/06
|
  
He sure does tell some good stories, like his fabricated PhD
georgeou | 11/11/06
|
good, flawed article
davebsr | 11/06/06
|

Are you sure? I've only been implementing and teaching IPSEC
georgeou | 11/06/06
|
 
So?
jragosta | 11/06/06
|
(nt)Anything that does away with the need for NAT is a *good thing*
toadlife | 11/06/06
|

Why?
nucrash | 11/06/06
|
 
There are companies that own Class A blocks who use NAT
georgeou | 11/06/06
|
  
NAT
rkuhn040172@... | 11/06/06
|
  
What should it tell us George?
toadlife | 11/06/06
|
   
It tells us companies choose to NAT even when they don't have to
georgeou | 11/06/06
|
    
Bad logic George
toadlife | 11/06/06
|
     
Not arguing with you there
georgeou | 11/06/06
|
 
Silliness
toadlife | 11/06/06
|
  
Why
D. T. Schmitz | 11/06/06
|
   
I see you've never dealt with NAT much
toadlife | 11/06/06
|
  
I can see both sides
georgeou | 11/06/06
|
   
Yes.
toadlife | 11/06/06
|
Why would IPv6 get rid of NAT?
lamp299 | 11/07/06
|

You and your tinfoil hat can continue to use NAT all you want
toadlife | 11/07/06
|
 
So what is IPv6 to IPv4 tunneling?
georgeou | 11/07/06
|
 
IPv6 will be WORSE than NAT
georgeou | 11/08/06
|
  
Not the point
toadlife | 11/08/06
|
   
The point is that the road to IPv6 hasn't been properly thought out
georgeou | 11/08/06
|
   
I hope not.
osreinstall | 11/09/06
|
    
Boloney
toadlife | 11/09/06
|
     
It isn't Baloney Toad
osreinstall | 11/09/06
|
     
yes it is
toadlife | 11/09/06
|
     
You can still NAT with IPv6 if you want
georgeou | 11/09/06
|
     
No it isn't toad. You are the only one.
osreinstall | 11/09/06
|
     
thanks for making my argument
toadlife | 11/09/06
|
     
Remember that NAT is also RIAA lawsuit insurance
georgeou | 11/09/06
|
     
I did not make your argument. You stated NAT will die.
osreinstall | 11/09/06
|
     
And now you put words in my mount
toadlife | 11/10/06
|
     
Perhaps, but you inferred it..
osreinstall | 11/10/06
|
     
Ok, I'm going to concede on your point
toadlife | 11/10/06
|
     
Good debating you also.
osreinstall | 11/10/06
|
Be nice to old Bob
JetJaguar | 11/08/06
|

I take fraud pretty seriously
georgeou | 11/08/06
|
 
If you take fraud so seriously...
jragosta | 11/08/06
|
  
If anyone thinks I lied, bring it on
georgeou | 11/08/06
|
Francisco Reis
Francisco Reis | 11/16/06
|