Kindle Format?
dunraven | 10/15/09
|

Oh my
LadyGray | 10/15/09
|
 
Re-Read
dunraven | 10/16/09
|
  
Irony
LadyGray | 10/17/09
|
This is cool!
Heatlesssun | 10/15/09
|
RE: Google challenges e-readers by taking e-books directly to browser
durano@... | 10/15/09
|
With Google, the only revenue model that counts is its own
P. Douglas | 10/15/09
|
hmmm
steeleblue_cactus | 10/15/09
|
RE: Google challenges e-readers by taking e-books directly to browser
T-Rexx | 10/15/09
|
How radical
Yagotta B. Kidding | 10/15/09
|
Glad I waited
kcredden2 | 10/15/09
|

your netbook can be your reader right now
EyeDrMike | 10/16/09
|
Makes sense, but...
Ed Burnette | 10/16/09
|
Never Needed Special Reader Hardware
bruceg@... | 10/16/09
|

agreed
EyeDrMike | 10/16/09
|
Google Needs to 'Google' These Posts
bruceg@... | 10/16/09
|

Correction
bruceg@... | 10/16/09
|
RE: Google challenges e-readers by taking e-books directly to browser
tjason@... | 10/16/09
|
I Love Ebooks
razrbackfan | 10/16/09
|
what format will Google use, EPUB?
bearlyworking | 10/16/09
|
RE: Google challenges e-readers by taking e-books directly to browser
raymond.doctor@... | 10/16/09
|
RE: Google challenges e-readers by taking e-books directly to browser
dlmohn | 10/16/09
|
RE: Google challenges e-readers by taking e-books directly to browser
scottmarlowe | 10/16/09
|
Old news: It's Been Done
johnbartley | 10/17/09
|